Admin, API and utils were all defining a value for SMS_CHAR_COUNT_LIMIT.
This value has been updated in notifications-utils to allow text
messages to be 4 fragments long and notifications-admin now gets the value of
SMS_CHAR_COUNT_LIMIT from notifications-utils instead of defining it in
config.
This test was a duplicate of that for branding
showing. This renames them both to better explain
what they do and makes the later one check for
branding styles.
This also removes the
`mock_get_letter_email_branding` param from the
first test as it wasn't being used.
Uses the configured service data retention page to display retention
period length, notification counts and fetch notifications from the
API on the notifications page.
Allows getting notification counts for a given number of days to
support services with custom data retention periods (admin
dashboard page should still display counts for the last 7 days,
while the notifications page displays all stored notifications).
Service contact details are needed if the upload document permission is
enabled - this used to be a link but services can now choose to use a
link, email address or phone number. The form to add or change service
contact details now gives these options and validates the data according
to the type of contact details provided.
When validating phone numbers we can't use the existing validation
because we want to allow landlines too, so there is a basic check that
the phone number is the right length and doesn't include certain
characters.
If you skip past the templates page (because you don’t have the edit
permission) but then click back you end up in a loop which redirects you
to the page you’re already on.
This commit makes sure that you’re sent back a step further, so you
don’t get stuck in that loop.
Since we have added a new, 5th permission the existing permissions
should be relabelled so that the five make sense as a coherent set.
We especially want to make sure that:
- the labels work against the checkboxes and against the tick/crosses on
the manage users page (a long time ago this page was layed out
differently so didn’t have space for full labels)
- there is no confusion between usage and reports
This commit also:
- re-adds a line about what all users can see (‘sent messages’) but
continues to omit the additional bullet points about templates and
team members (because we think this is clear enough from reading the
permissions)
- refactors the `Form` subclass so that the content and order of the
permissions only have to be defined once
- brings back the ‘permissions’ legend on the `fieldset`
We were taking letters away from basic view because there’s no one-off
sending of letters.
But now that basic view isn’t an opt-in thing but something we’re
rolling out to all users who only have the ‘send’ permission it feels
like too drastic a change to remove letters.
It’s too jarring to go straight from the list of templates to the upload
addresses page. So while we don’t have sending a one-off letter as a
thing, let’s keep the template page.
Our research and prototyping around ‘basic view’ found that:
- a lot of users who send messages rarely or never look at the dashboard
(yet it’s the first page they see when they sign in)
- team managers like the idea of taking away things that users don’t
need in order to make the interface simpler
We’ve disentangled the simpler way of sending messages from being part
of ‘basic view’. This means we can give managers the option of taking
away the dashboard as an independent choice, not something that’s
wrapped up in a separate ‘view’.
I think that this checkbox is a more straightforward proposition than
‘basic view’ ever was (despite all the work we did to explain it and
develop the nested checkbox pattern). In research users would often
explain the feature back to us as being about hiding the dashboard – we
should try to make Notify operate in terms of concepts that come
naturally to people wherever possible.
If you have a lot of services it’s hard to find the one you’re looking
for if the sort order is a mixture of `created_by` and which ones belong
to an organisation.
Since the templates within the services are sorted alphabetically it
makes sense to also sort the services alphabetically.
We’re going to make it possible for some users to be members of a
service, but not have any permissions (not even `view_activity`).
There are some pages that these users should still be able to see
These are the pages that a user with ‘basic view’ would have been able
to see, excluding those that let them send messages.
The one downside of skipping the template page is that you no longer
get such strong confirmation that you’ve picked the correct template.
You still see the preview of the template, but it’s further down the
page, and the name of the template has disappeared.
This commit adds the name of the template to the page title, to:
- have some continuity from the previous page
- make it easier to double-check you’ve chosen the correct template
If you only send messages then there’s no longer much point in the
template page. It now, for you, only has one action – ‘Send’.
This commit changes the journey for these users so they go straight from
clicking the name of the template to the page where you enter the phone
number or email address.
This is better because it reduces the number of steps a user has to
click through to send a message.
This journey is what we were previously calling ‘basic view’. But this
changes makes it automatically available to anyone who would benefit
from it. It removes the complexity of:
- having to opt in to basic view at a service level
- having to choose on a per-user basis who has basic view
- understanding the nuance between basic view and only choosing the
‘Send messages’ permission
Users who will still see the template page are:
- those who can edit templates – they need the ‘edit’ link
- users with the manage API keys permission – they need a place to get
the template ID
‘Upload recipients’ and ‘Send to one recipient’ have always been
slightly clunky phrases.
Now that basic view jumps straight into the ‘Send to one recipient’
flow there’s no way for users to get to the ‘Upload recipients’ flow.
By adding a link to it from the ‘Send to one recipient’ flow it’s
possible for users of basic view to access it.
But we don’t want to introduce too much inconsistency between basic view
and admin view because users will be migrating from one to another. They
might also be talking to their manager, who wouldn’t be able to tell
them where to click if they were looking at two completely different
interfaces.
This also means that we can keep the left-hand navigation in basic view
nice and simple with the two options (‘Templates’ and ‘Sent messages’),
rather than trying to introduce something like ‘Send one message’ and
‘Send lots of messages’ later on.
Includes moving code that tests an API call to
update the service with the new branding to the
preview step submission.
Also includes a change to the HTTP params sent by
the set-email-branding step. Think it was missed
out of this PR:
https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-admin/pull/1843
...so was never changed to 'branding_style'.
- corrects target page for set_email_branding to
new preview step instead of itself
- removed check for helper method being called in
email page test
- updates expected result for test of global
headers to include changes to `frame-src`
- updates navigation config with brand preview page
This is the existing behaviour. It’s broken by this issue in WTForms
2.2.1: https://github.com/wtforms/wtforms/issues/401
This commit hand-crafts the default value, because WTForms is ignoring
the `default` argument on the form object attribute.
Not really sure how this ever worked 🤔
There are some teams who send jobs on a daily/weekly basis. They have
team members who only use Notify for this purpose. So they would
probably benefit from basic view, because they don’t need to see the
dashboard.
This commit:
- adds a new item (uploaded files) to the basic view navigation for
teams that have sent at least one job
- makes the job pages visible to basic view users
I think we should do this now, rather than as a later enhancement to
basic view. We only have one chance to announce the feature, so teams
who do send jobs may otherwise discount it as not useful for them and
the opportunity to have them use it is lost.
Calling `.set()` with `True` stores the byte string `'True'` which
cannot subsequently be decoded from JSON (because boolean values in
JSON are lowercase, ie `true`).
