1. Create a separate billing blueprint to house these endpoints
2. Return monthly breakdown in same format as we did before
3. Return yearly breakdown but only return {billing units, rate,
notification_type}. Admin only makes use of these.
This will need to be refactored after the deployment of api and admin and after the update script for existing services using inbound numbers has been executed.
1. For both email and sms, store [] in monthly_totals if
there is no billing data (no notifications sent etc.) and
return this via the API
2. General refactoring of indentation
The use for the public template API is for building caseworking systems
or similar, where you might need a list of templates to pick from (ie
instead of using the Notify web interface to pick from and send a
message).
Right now our API isn’t returning the template name as part of the
response. The name is a useful, human-friendly way of identifying a
template.
This commit changes the response to include the name.
Some clients will need updating before this can be useful.
* Previously we were only returning SMS. Let's make this return for
a given notification type.
* General refactor of the monthly retrieval query
* Return an empty BillingData tuple if email billing data is empty
When populating the monthly billing records on a schedule, we need
to ensure the correct month is being updated.
As an example, if the current datetime is 31 Mar 2016, 23:00. The
BST equivalent is the 1st April. Therefore we need to ensure we
update billing for April, not March. This takes care of that.
previously in run_app_paas.sh, we captured stdout from the app and
piped that into the log file. However, this came up with a bunch of
problems, mainly:
* exceptions with stack traces often weren't formatted properly,
and kibana could not parse them
* celery logs were duplicated - we'd collect both the json logs and
the human readable stdout logs.
instead, with the updated utils library, we can use that to log json
straight to the appropriate directory directly.
Why is this needed?
When a user updates a service name they enter the new name in a form, are then asked to confirm the change by entering their password. Then the API call to update_service is called. If we let the update serivce API call fail with the integrity constraint it will be ackward for the user.
