- Renaming /service/<id>/deactivate to /service/<id>/archive to match language on the UI.
- Will need to update admin before deleting the deactive service method
- Created dao and endpoint methods to suspend and resume a service.
- I confirm the use of suspend and resume with a couple people on the team, seems to be the right choice.
The idea is that if you archive a service there is no coming back from that.
To suspend a service is marking it as inactive and revoking the api keys. To resume a service is to mark the service as active, the service will need to create new API keys.
It makes sense that if a service is under threat that the API keys should be renewed.
The next PR will update the code to check that the service is active before sending the request or allowing any actions by the service.
We already filter the usage-by-month query by financial year. When we
show the total usage for a service, we should be able to filter this
by financial year.
Then, when the two lots of data are put side by side, it all adds up.
This PR changes the response to POST /notifications/sms/<mmg | firetext> from a 400 response to a 200 response.
If we get a callback for a notification more than once or for a notification we log that but we return a 200 success response to the provider.
We have found that there is a situation where the send to provider throws a timeout exception but the provider did get the message, but we still send it to them again.
In which case they send the message twice, and callback for the message twice.
Another case where we may get duplicate callbacks is that the network gave the provider two callbacks meaning they pass those two callbacks onto us.
So it is really difficult to know if we sent to the provider twice or just got two callbacks.
The test_callback has many changes because I took the opportunity to use the client conftest fixture rather than the notify_api fixture.
The only 2 tests really changed are test_mmg_callback_returns_200_when_notification_id_not_found_or_already_updated and test_firetext_callback_returns_200_when_notification_id_not_found_or_already_updated
Previously research mode created a task to fake the callback from the providers. This meant there is an extra task for each notification than would be generated in a live situation.
This PR changes that, so that a research mode/test key notification calls the callback API rather than make a task to do that .
This ensures that the flow for research mode more closely mimics that of live, and removes a task from the process so we can more accurately test throughput,
the `to` field stores either the phone number or the email address
of the recipient - it's a bit more complicated for letters, since
there are address lines 1 through 6, and a postcode. In utils, they're
stored alongside the personalisation, and we have to ensure that when
we persist to the database we keep as much parity with utils to make
our work easier. Aside from sending, the `to` field is also used to
show recipients on the front end report pages - we've decided that the
best thing to store here is address_line_1 - which is probably going to
be either a person's name, company name, or PO box number
Also, a lot of tests and test cleanup - I added create_template and
create_notification functions in db.py, so if you're creating new
fixtures you can use these functions, and you won't need to pass
notify_db and notify_db_session around, huzzah!
also removed create param from sample_notification since it's not used
anywhere
it's almost entirely duplicated so share it across.
also clean up retrying - `task.retry(...)` raises a
celery.exceptions.Retry object, so you do not need to `raise` its
response. additionally, cleaned up tests around that since raising
Exception and asserting Exception is raised is dangerous as it could
mask actual programming errors
This meant that the research mode task would never work.
Also the way we mark data as "temporary-failure" with firetext is with first a pending status callback then a declined callback.
This PR changes the research mode task to account for that situation.
Right now we strip HTML from templates at the point of saving them. This
also converts stuff like ampersands to their entity form (eg &) and
this is what we save in the database.
This is a bad idea when you’re sending a text message or a letter, in
which an HTML entity makes no sense. But we still need to encode HTML in
the body of HTML emails.
The right place to do this is when rendering the templates. The code to
do this is now in utils. So this commit:
- pull in this new utils code
- removes the old
- adds some integration tests to make sure that everything is working
as expected (more thorough unit tests are happening in utils)
