This is being done for the PaaS migration to allow us to keep traffic coming in whilst we migrate the database.
uses the same tasks as the CSV uploaded notifications. Simple changes to not persist the notification, and call into a different task.
We are using the notify queue in this iteration because that queue is a low volume queue with it's own dedicated workers. This just saves us from building a new queue at this point, and a new queue may not be necessary.
- Added the `simulate` notification logic to version 2. We have 3 email addresses and phone numbers that are used
to simulate a successful post to /notifications. This was missed out of the version 2 endpoint.
- Added a test to template_dao to check for the default value of normal for new templates
- in v2 get_notifications, casted the path param to a uuid, if not uuid abort(404)
brings in a fix to InvalidEmail/Phone/AddressExceptions not being
instantiated correctly. `exception.message` is not a python standard,
so we shouldn't be relying on it to transmit exception reasons -
rather we should be using `str(exception)` instead. This involved a
handful of small changes to the schema validation
* Ensure we dont raise exception if e.cause does not contain a message
* Ensure we handle case where e.path may be empty
* Refactor existing tests to conform to new format
This PR fixes that and adds a test for it.
I am confused as to why I had to change the test_validators test that is checking if the mock is called.
Why did this code pass on preview?
Created a new schema that accepts request parameters for the
get_notifications v2 route.
Using that to validate now instead of the marshmallow validation.
Also changed the way formatted error messages are returned because
the previous way was cutting off our failing `enum` messages.
The "cost" value was flawed for a couple of reasons.
1. Lots of messages are free, so in those instances the "cost"
doesn't tell you anything
2. The query to get the rate was expensive and we don't have
an obvious way to get it back very efficiently for large numbers
of notifications.
So we scrapped it.
Our previous test ws returning a notification without a `sent_by`
attribute, which meant that cost was always 0.
Unfortunately, this meant that returning a real value for cost was
untested and (whaddya know) it broke immediately.
Old test scenario:
- billable_units=1, sent_by=None, cost=0
New scenarios
- billable_units=0, sent_by='mmg', cost=0
- billable_units=1, sent_by='mmg', cost=1
The new 'v2' API wants to return less data than the previous one,
which was sending back tons of fields the clients never used.
This new route returns only useful information, with the JSON
response dict being built up in the model's `.serialize()` method.
Note that writing the test for this was a bit painful because of
having to treat loads of keys differently. Hopefully we think this
is a good way to write this test, because if we don't, we should
start thinking of a better way to check the values are what we
expect.
In the V2 API, the GET response for an individual notification
returns a 'cost' value, which we can get by multiplying the
billable units by the per-message rate of the supplier who
sent the message.
Any notifications with billable units > 0 but without a
corresponding `ProviderRates` entry will blow up the application,
so make sure you've got one.
