it doesn't really do any verification - that's the webauthn code in the
browser and the admin app that does that. Instead, this completes the
login flow, by marking the user as logged in in the database. Added a
docstring that explains this process a bit more, and also added a new
route: /<id>/complete/webauthn. We'll move the admin code over to use
this new url in time
The trouble is the aggregate query to return the big blue numbers on the dashboard and /notifications/{notification_type} page is taking too long to return.
I have some ideas on how to improve the query, but should take some time to do some more research and test. In the meantime, let's just ignore "todays" total numbers for the high volume services. There are only two services that this will affect.
We haven't bumped the test version for a while.
Also bumped the version of Flask and itsdangerous.
In order to fix flask warnings I needed to changed how the blueprints were registerd.
It's always going to be in the future anyway.
After some analysis the query does perform better without it.
I'll make a note to update other queries where we get todays
notification data to remove the end date filter in a separate PR.
Many of the team members do not look at emails from zendesk, adding a current_app.logger.error message for things we care about to give developers a better chance of seeing them.
I have purposely not added an erro log for `check_for_services_with_high_failure_rates_or_sending_to_tv_numbers` because it's not something we need to look at immediately.
with sms and email auth the api handles verifying logins in the
`/<user_id>/verify/code` endpoint, when it checks the code is valid etc.
The admin app has already done this for webauthn logins, but we still
need an API endpoint so that we can set up the user's db entry to have
a new logged in timestamp, a new session id (this is important for
logging out other browser sessions), etc.
Also, we need to be able to make sure that the user's max login count
isn't exceeded. If it's exceeded, we shouldn't let them log in even with
a valid webauthn check.
This endpoint is a POST where the admin passes in a json dict with key
"succesful" being True or False. True sets up the db stuff as mentioned.
False just increments the failed login count.
simplify logic by changing the dao function to require a user id and a
webauthn cred id. Note that this changes the response from a 400 to a
404 if the cred is for a different user than the supplied id.
give a minimum length to the text fields in POSTS to create/update a
credential to avoid surprising unexpected edge cases involving empty
string names etc.
Also fix tests:
First add init file so the tests are found correctly, then update
the tests after we stopped serialising webauthn
registration_response.
added some simple validation to the delete endpoint for sanity, but
generally my assumption is that more validation will happen on the admin
side.
noteably im not checking whether the credentials are duplicated, nor is
there a uniqueness constraint in the database - I'm not sure if the
credential blob will always reliably be equivalent, and I believe the
browser should hopefully take care of dupes.
so we can be in line with what the admin handles, and keep it simple on
the api side and do as little manipulation of binary data as possible.
### Minor changes
* id is a UUID we can use for referencing within notify. No relation to
the key itself.
* name is a user viewable name that can be set/edited
* fix updated_at to have onupdate, not default
### Simplify the webauthn data
credential_data is the data we store about an authenticator that we'll
use to identify the key when logging in. includes the credential_id, the
public_key, and the aaguid (which identifies the authenticator
make/model)
registration_response is the data containing audit information - in the
future we can use this to ensure that the authenticators used are of
high quality.
both of these fields are CBOR (a kind of binary json), encoded in
base64 so that they can be embedded within our regular JSON api
endpoints. we don't anticipate the api ever needing to interact with
this data directly.
This will allow admin to pass through a value of "government" for the
broadcast_channel. We don't have any logic around the value of service.broadcast_channel,
so no updates are needed to the tasks etc.
