The check for aggregation was too broad and hence was adding together
totals based on template_id and not the unqiue combination of
template id, month and year.
- Added test to test for the failure
- Added check and a test to for template_id, mon and year matches
- Celery process name did not match the task
The template name should be returned for the response and the user will
pick a year, so ths adds those two features to the
notifications/templates_usage/monthly endpoint and added some tests to
test the functionality.
Added a new endpoint which combines the usage of the stats table and the
data from the notifications tables, instead of using all the data from
the notification_history table. This should speed up the query times
and improve the page performance.
- Updated to make the stats create and update function transactional as
it actually wasn't committing the data to the table
- Added the get from the stats table
- Add a a method to combine the two results
- Added the endpoint
Removes notifications.template_id foreign key and replaces it with
a composite foreign key constraint to TemplateHistory using the
existing notification columns for template ID and template version.
Foreign key constraint is created as NOT VALID to avoid locking the
notifications table while postgres verifies that existing records
don't break the constraint. From postgres docs:
> If the constraint is marked NOT VALID, the potentially-lengthy initial
> check to verify that all rows in the table satisfy the constraint is
> skipped. The constraint will still be enforced against subsequent
> inserts or updates (that is, they'll fail unless there is a matching
> row in the referenced table, in the case of foreign keys; and they'll
> fail unless the new row matches the specified check constraints). But
> the database will not assume that the constraint holds for all rows
> in the table, until it is validated by using the VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
> option.
VALIDATE CONSTRAINT will be issued as a separate migration in a
follow-up PR.
Adds test for:
* checking the template version foreign key constraint
* checking that template changes don't affect existing notifications
* notification statistics aren't affected by different template versions
* notification stats always return the current template name
Relationship attribute is not used by the application code, so we
can remove it without replacing it with a TemplateHistory one.
This also updates the foreign key constraint to refer to the composite
primary key for the TemplateHistory records.
TemplateHistory objects need to be connected to the template's
TemplateRedacted record. This requires setting up a new SQLAlchemy
relationship to allow accessing redact_personalisation from
TemplateHistory instances.
We can avoid creating a foreign key in this case by setting up an
explicit `primaryjoin` expression. Since TemplateHistory.id is
created from Template.id and TemplateRedacted.template_id is
already a foreign key to Template.id the foreign key should always
be valid even without a DB constraint.
Notifications.serialize calls `Notifications.template.get_link`, so
we need TemplateHistory objects to generate their API URLs.
This generates a link to the `/v2/` version of the endpoint.
`create_custom_template` is not using `dao_create_template` since
it explicitly sets a template id. Notifications.template relationship
now refers to a TemplateHistory objects, so we need to make sure that
`create_custom_template` creates a matching TemplateHistory record
when it creates a Template.
`Notification.template` changed from being a Template relationship
to TemplateHistory. When a relationship attribute is being assigned,
SQLAlchemy checks that the assigned value type matches the relationship
type. Since most tests at the moment create a notification using a
Template instance this check fails.
Rewriting the tests to use TemplateHistory objects would require
changes to the majority of tests. Instead, when creating a notification
objects we assign the foreign key attributes directly. This skips the
SQLAlchemy type check, but we still get the constraint check on the
foreign keys, so a matching TemplateHistory object needs to exist in
the database.
`Notification.template_history` relationship has been removed but
we want to keep the `template_history` key in existing notification
serializations, so we serialize it from `Notifications.template`.
This keeps the data format the same, but both `template` and
`template_history` keys will now contain data from the `TemplateHistory`
instance.
