This adds a new platform admin settings row, leading a page which
shows any existing keys and allows a new one to be registered. Until
the APIs for this are implemented, the user API client just returns
some stubbed data for manual testing.
This also includes a basic JavaScript module to do the main work of
registering a new authenticator, to be implemented in the next commits.
Some more minor notes:
- Setting the headings in the mapping_table is necessary to get the
horizontal rule along the top (to match the design).
- Setting caption to False in the mapping_table is necessary to stop
an extra margin appearing at the top.
This is the first step in making the UI easier for setting the
options for a broadcast service. Here we remove the options for
"Training mode" test channels. When we create a broadcast message for a trail mode service it is marked as stubbed and does not create a broadcast event that is sent to a provider.
The label for the form and setting page have been updated to reflect the
change.
Previously there was no indication that a service was suspended.
While this could also be shown for archived/deleted services, the
meaning is similar enough that it makes sense there too - the name
of the archived service should distinguish it as being archived.
For someone who has retrieved a template ID from their system the only
way to find it in Notify is:
- hack the URL
- click through every template, visually inspecting the ID shown on the
page until you find the right one
Neither of these is ideal.
This commit adds searching by ID, for those services who have an API
integration. This means we don’t need to confuse teams who aren’t using
the API by talking about IDs.
This is similar to how we let these teams search for notifications by
reference[1]
1. https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-admin/pull/3223/files
Now we’ve split the old alerts onto two pages the verbs (‘Broadcast’ and
‘Rejected’) will always be the same for each alert – so they’re not
adding any differentiation.
The specifics of what the datetime means is available on the page for
each alert.
Removing the verbs makes the page a bit less cluttered and makes it
easier to scan down the right hand column.
The code for this page was making assumptions about properties which
aren’t present on rejected broadcasts.
This commit accounts for those properties and presents the relevant
elements on the page.
Two reasons to not hide rejected broadcasts:
- if a broadcast was rejected by mistake then it’s useful to have an
audit of who did that
- it means you can still see old broadcasts without having to leave
in pending-approval, which is dangerous because they might
accidentally be approved
We've seen someone getting a `500` when trying to visit the `/metrics`
endpoint. This is because the metrics endpoint is not in the `main`
blueprint, so we can't use url_for with a relative endpoint.
Although only bots visit '/metrics' without authorisation, this stops
the odd `500`.
There are basically two kinds of 4G masts:
Frequency | Range | Bandwidth
----------|-------------|----------------------------------
800MHz | Long (500m) | Low (can handle a bit of traffic)
1800Mhz | Short (5km) | High (can handle lots of traffic)
The 1800Mhz masts are better in terms of how much traffic they can
handle and how fast a connection they provide. But because they have
quite short range, it’s only economical to install them in very built up
areas†.
In more rural areas the 800MHz masts are better because they cover a
wider area, and have enough bandwidth for the lower population density.
The net effect of this is that cell broadcasts in rural areas are likely
to bleed further, because the masts they are being broadcast from are
less precise.
We can use population density as a proxy for how likely it is to be
covered by 1800Mhz masts, and therefore how much bleed we should expect.
So this commit varies the amount of bleed shown based on the population
density.
I came up with the formula based on 3 fixed points:
- The most remote areas (for example the Scottish Highlands) should have
the highest average bleed, estimated at 5km
- An town, like Crewe, should have about the same bleed as we were
estimating before (1.5km) – Pete D thinks this is about right based on
his knowledge of the area around his office in Crewe
- The most built up areas, like London boroughs, could have as little as
500m of bleed
Based on these three figures I came up with the following formula, which
roughly gives the right bleed distance (`b`) for each of their population
densities (`d`):
```
b = 5900 - (log10(d) × 1_250)
```
Plotted on a curve it looks like this:
This is based on averages – remember that the UI shows where is _likely_
to receive the alert, based on bleed, not where it’s _possible_ to
receive the alert.
Here’s what it looks like on the map:
---
†There are some additional subtleties which make this not strictly true:
- The 800Mhz masts are also used in built up areas to fill in the gaps
between the areas covered by the 1800Mhz masts
- Switching between masts is inefficient, so if you’re moving fast
through a built up area (for example on a train) your phone will only
use the 800MHz masts so that you have to handoff from one mast to
another less often
The `/accounts` page was listing trial mode services twice if a user
belonged to an org. They were shown under both the 'Live services' and
'Trial mode services' sections. After this change, 'Live services' will
show all live services (whether or not they belong to an org) and 'Trial
mode services' will show all trial mode services. If a user belongs to an
org, they will also see the summary of how many services per org at the
top of the page.
A couple of services in tests were renamed for clarity.
We used to upload this to performance platform to show the list of
services and organisations.
There is no longer a performance platform to upload this file to.
This uses the existing endpoint so it matches what’s on the homepage.
It will be more up-to-date than the list of services, but no-one’s going
to be adding things up to check they match exactly.
This matches the existing performance platform page, and I think is a
bit easier to read for high-level numbers where you don’t need to see
that they’re changing second-by-second.
