This page is exactly the same as the page for adding your first service, save
the heading text.
So all this commit does is:
- set up two routes (`/add-service`, `/add-service/first`) for each of the two
journeys and change the existing journeys to use the `/add-service/first`
route
- add logic to show different heading text depending on the journey
- add a link to the new (`/add-service`) route in the service chooser dropdown
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/111614524
Not clear if we are going to have code examples on this page, or if the
documentation will be hosted somewhere else.
It seems unecessary to put documentation behind a log in, so I’d lean towards
this page just being links.
This commit adds a component for showing an API key. Usage:
```jinja
{{ from 'components/api-key.html' import api_key }}
{{ api_key('e1b0751388f3cd0fc9982c701acdb3c2') }}
```
Depending on the user’s browser, it works in three different ways.
No Javascript
---
The API key is shown on the page.
Older browsers with Javascript
---
The API key is hidden, and users can click a button to reveal it.
Newer browsers that support copying to clipboard without Flash
---
As above, but when the key is shown there is a button which copies it to the
clipboard. This is acheived by using
[this polyfill](https://www.npmjs.com/package/query-command-supported)
to reliably detect browser support for the ‘copy’ command.
The styling of the component is a bit different to the initial sketch. I think
a grey button works better than green. Green feels like it’s going to take you
somewhere else.
Because:
- GOV.UK elements is now published with a package.json that only install the
SASS files (https://github.com/alphagov/govuk_elements/pull/156)
- We can drop Git submodules, so one less dependency management tool
This commit also changes the `gulpfile.js` and `main.scss` files to use the
assets from `node_modules` rather than the Git submodules.
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
This is a link not a button because:
- it’s less prominent—delete is an infrequent action
- it’s a two-step process, and only the second part changes any data (so it has
a button)
If the templates page contains text messages and emails then there’s two ways it
could be structured:
- into two sections, all text messages first, then all emails
- emails and text messages interleaved, sorted by date
I think the second one is better. Imagine a situation where you mostly do emails
but have a few text messages. You’d have to scroll past the text messages to get
to your emails. Every time.
I reckon that the most commonly accessed templates will be the most recent ones.
Because a user can have multiple services, they need a way to navigate between
them. Normally they can use the ▶ Switcher to do this, except when:
- they first sign in
- they are on a page which isn’t associated with a service (eg user profile) in
which case we can’t use the switcher because it won’t know what the ‘current’
service is
So this commit adds a new page with a (fake) list of services.
