Adds ability to have inline radio buttons using the fieldset.inline
functionality from gov.uk elements.
Then implements this for the radio buttons for choosing postage
class.
Also overrides the gov uk elements styling for the inline radio
buttons to place them slightly closer together as this looks
better.
HighlightTags was bad because:
- we haven’t called placeholders ‘tags’ for a long time
- it also does resizing of the `<textarea>`, not just highlighting the
placeholders
Scrolling within textareas on the page is a bit grim. Which is why we
don’t do it for the textboxes that people use to edit templates.
This commit will allow us to extend the auto-resizing of `<textarea>`s
to those which don’t need the highlighting of placeholders.
The code is still quite coupled to the placeholder highlighting code,
because both work by copying the content of the `<textarea>` into a
`<div>` that underlaps the textbox. This `<div>` is used for both
rendering the placeholder highlights, and calculating the natural height
of the content. So it would be hard/confusing to split the two bits of
code into separate modules.
The mixture of three column/two column layouts on this page has always
looked a bit disjointed. And since the left column will only even
contain the names of months, which are short, it doesn’t need a full
half of the page width.
Scanning the page is difficult at the moment because it’s hard to tell
how far apart in time events are, and thereby determine which events
might be related.
Grouping the events by day quickly lets users narrow their focus to
a meaningful subset of the events.
Otherwise you have a visible copy of the text underlapping the text in the textbox. Which, when they don’t quite align makes the text look bold. Seems to be more noticeable on some browsers/operating systems than others, but a bug all the same.
This is mainly because tests don't inferr that
global variables are just properties of the window
object, as browsers do, but it also makes this
more explicit.
When testing with the JAWS screenreader, we found
a bug around getting it to announce the name of a
fieldset when we ask the user to select from it.
Bug on pivotal:
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/165565088
The flows for adding a new template and moving a
template/folder both need the user to select an
option from a radio group. When we add the radio
group to the UI, we need to move focus to it so
the user is in the right place to choose an
option.
The expectation of the original code was that
focusing the field set's legend would work like
focusing the heading of a section of content and
announce the label of it. This didn't happen with
JAWS. This tries to achieve the same by focusing
the whole fieldset instead.
When doing this we also hide the focus style, to
follow the convention for this across www.gov.uk.
Most GP practice services are named after the practice, which is the
organisation.
So rather than make people re-type the name of their organisation (and
potentially make a typo) let’s just let them say ‘yes, that’s the name
of my organisation’.
Our usage for these browsers in the last month is down to 0.2% of all
users, or 14 individual users, according to Google Analytics.
These users also visit about half the number of pages per sessions,
suggesting that they’re not signed in.
`clearEvents` helps write the tests and also gives
users the opportunity to remove all of this
functionality.
Refactor of `setEvents` tidies up use of `self`.
This module creates a clone of the existing table
as an extra layer which sits on top of it.
This allows the row headers to sit above the table
content when it scrolls.
We were setting `role=presentation` on the extra
table to hide it from assistive technologies.
It seems that this wasn't working. From the spec'
`role-presentation` should remove the semantics of
the table but leave the content.
Testing in Safari, with the OSX Accessibility
Inspector, this isn't happening and the table is
still being reported as a table by the
accessibility API.
This changes to the `aria-hidden` attribute, to
make sure the extra table is ignored.
Keyboard users select a time slot by moving to the
radio for that slot, using the arrow keys, and
selecting it by pressing 'space' or 'enter', like
a `<select>`.
We allow this by listening for 'keydown' events
from the 'enter' or 'space' keys on time slot
radios that are checked.
Browsers fire 'click' events alongside the
'keydown' event meaning it's possible for the
code that makes the selection to be run twice.
We currently guard against this by checking for
the `pageX` property of the event object,
reasoning that a click event fired by a key press
won't have a cursor position.
Most browsers we support set it to `0` but it
isn't always the case:
https://dom-event-test.glitch.me/results.html
For those browsers, the `!event.pageX` condition
resolves correctly so this works. Safari and
versions of Internet Explorer before 11 however,
set it to a positive number.
In those browsers, moving the selection between
radios using the arrow keys fired a 'click' event
which, in Safari and IE<11, was treated as a
mouse/touch event and so confirmed the selection.
This made it impossible to select a later time.
These changes replace the 'click' event on time
slots with an artifical one that tracks
mouse/trackpad clicks by listening for a
'mousedown' followed by a 'mouseup' on a time
slot. This doesn't fire on key presses so avoids
the problem.
Clicking the 'Done' button resets the module to
its default state. 'Done' implies you've
completed your selection so this doesn't make
sense.
This changes it so any selection made will be
confirmed when 'Done' is clicked.
It helps the tests to know the `Hogan` variable is
actually a property of the global variable
(`window` in this case) and doesn't hurt the
readability of the script.
If you can see a folder but not its parents we concatenate the
breadcrumb into one link.
This styles folder separators inside these links a bit differently to
make them do a bit less visual separation than the ones outside the
links.
It looks weird to have two different visual treatments for showing a
navigable hierarchy.
I reckon losing the slash won’t make things less folder like – Windows
for example uses chevrons as foler separators.
It was a bit inconsistent depending on whether there was/wasn’t a search
box or channel tabs on the page.
I found this just too complicated to do in pure CSS, so added a new
spacing class which gets toggled on and off.
Now that there’s a bit more stuff in the service name area at the top
of the page it looks a bit cramped. Moving the heading down gives it a
bit more space to breath, and associates the heading a bit more closely
with the content after it.
This commit aligns and spaces elements on the page to show which are
related to others.
This needs some adjustment now because we potentially have more things
on the page now – we need to make space for them.
Service names can be quite long. Organisation names can be quite long.
Together they can be very long. This isn’t great because:
- sometimes they overflow the width of the container, which looks broken
- even if they’re not that long they can make the UI look quite
cluttered
This commit restricts them to widths that should stop the above from
happening. In the case of the organisation name the width has
specifically been chosen to line up with the ¼ and ¾ column grid
used by the navigation.
At the moment, the process for accepting the data sharing and financial
agreement is:
1. download a pdf
* print it out
* get someone to sign it
* scan it
* email it back to us
* we rename the file and save it in Google Drive
* we then update the organisation to say the MOU is signed
* sometimes we also:
* print it out and get it counter-signed
* scan it again
* email it back to the service
Let's not do that any more.
When the first service for an organisation that doesn't have the
agreement in place is in the process of going live, then they should
be able to accept the agreement online as part of the go live flow. This
commit adds the pages that let someone do that.
Where the checklist shows the agreement as **[not completed]** then
they can follow a link where they can download it (as happens now).
From here, they should then also be able to provide some info to accept
it. The info that we need is:
**Version** – because we version the agreements occasionally, we need to
know which version they are accepting. It may not be the latest one if
they downloaded it a while ago and it took time to be signed off
**Who is accepting the agreement** – this will often be someone in the
finance team, and not necessarily a team member, so we should let the
person either accept as themselves, or on behalf of someone else. If
it's on behalf of someone else we need to the name and email address of
that person so we have that on record. Obvs if it's them accepting it
themselves, we have that already (so we just store their user ID and
not their name or email address).
We then replay the collected info back in a sort of legally
binding kind of way pulling in the organisation name too. The wording
we’re using is inspired by what GOV.UK Pay have. Then there’s a big
green button they can click to accept the agreement, which stores their
user ID and and timestamp.
The scrollable tables code styles some of the cells in the target table
by looking for the `table-field-center-aligned` class.
This class was renamed in 0512f40ad3
This commit updates the scrollable tables code to refer to the new
classname, which means that things should line up properly when drawing
the table.
At the moment we have a blanket rule that users can’t archive their own
services, to prevent someone accidentally deleting a real live service,
because that would be Very Bad.
But the tickets we get from users asking us to delete services are for
services they set up when they were just trying out Notify. There’s not
much harm in letting users delete these services, the consequences of
doing so are much lower than those of deleting a live service. And it
should mean fewer support tickets for us to deal with.
