The previous service switcher was built purely in Javascript, which meant that,
for the purposes of progressive enhancement, it had to load in the open state.
Setting it to the closed state with Javascript happened a fraction of a second
after page load. This caused an unpleasant flicker as the whole page shifted up
and down as it loaded.
This commit changes the switcher to use the native HTML5 `details` and
`summary` elements[1].
This commit adds a polyfill from GOV.UK Elements for browsers which don’t
support `details`/`summary`.
1. http://html5doctor.com/the-details-and-summary-elements/
This page is exactly the same as the page for adding your first service, save
the heading text.
So all this commit does is:
- set up two routes (`/add-service`, `/add-service/first`) for each of the two
journeys and change the existing journeys to use the `/add-service/first`
route
- add logic to show different heading text depending on the journey
- add a link to the new (`/add-service`) route in the service chooser dropdown
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/111614524
Not clear if we are going to have code examples on this page, or if the
documentation will be hosted somewhere else.
It seems unecessary to put documentation behind a log in, so I’d lean towards
this page just being links.
This commit adds a component for showing an API key. Usage:
```jinja
{{ from 'components/api-key.html' import api_key }}
{{ api_key('e1b0751388f3cd0fc9982c701acdb3c2') }}
```
Depending on the user’s browser, it works in three different ways.
No Javascript
---
The API key is shown on the page.
Older browsers with Javascript
---
The API key is hidden, and users can click a button to reveal it.
Newer browsers that support copying to clipboard without Flash
---
As above, but when the key is shown there is a button which copies it to the
clipboard. This is acheived by using
[this polyfill](https://www.npmjs.com/package/query-command-supported)
to reliably detect browser support for the ‘copy’ command.
The styling of the component is a bit different to the initial sketch. I think
a grey button works better than green. Green feels like it’s going to take you
somewhere else.
Because:
- GOV.UK elements is now published with a package.json that only install the
SASS files (https://github.com/alphagov/govuk_elements/pull/156)
- We can drop Git submodules, so one less dependency management tool
This commit also changes the `gulpfile.js` and `main.scss` files to use the
assets from `node_modules` rather than the Git submodules.
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
This is a link not a button because:
- it’s less prominent—delete is an infrequent action
- it’s a two-step process, and only the second part changes any data (so it has
a button)
If the templates page contains text messages and emails then there’s two ways it
could be structured:
- into two sections, all text messages first, then all emails
- emails and text messages interleaved, sorted by date
I think the second one is better. Imagine a situation where you mostly do emails
but have a few text messages. You’d have to scroll past the text messages to get
to your emails. Every time.
I reckon that the most commonly accessed templates will be the most recent ones.
