This mocks out a data structure for a job’s messages, and renders this data:
- on the notification page, as a table, which links through to…
- …the page for an indidivual message
- adds a table of recent activity to the job page, which is shared by the
dashboard page
- uses the same filename and message template as the first job shown on the
dashboard
- sets the time of file uploads/message delivery/message sending to always
match ‘just now’
Having the full history of the message is more information than is necessary.
We should only show what stage the message is at, and the time that it reached
that stage.
We can do research later on to find out if users understand or care about the
different stages.
- adds a table of recent activity to the job page, which is shared by the
dashboard page
- uses the same filename and message template as the first job shown on the
dashboard
- sets the time of file uploads/message delivery/message sending to always
match ‘just now’
These are basic tests to make sure that the pages stay stitched together.
Added for both the jobs and send SMS flows (because the send SMS flow didn’t
have any before)
This mocks out a data structure for a job’s messages, and renders this data:
- on the notification page, as a table, which links through to…
- …the page for an indidivual message
This commit’s parent introduces a Node-based way of managing front end assets.
Nothing else is needed in the app, specifically not Flask Assets. Flask itself
automatically routes requests for `domain.tld/static/*` to the files in
`app/static`.
This also removes all the Ruby stuff.
…or how to move a bunch of things from a bunch of different places into
`app/static`.
There are three main reasons not to use Flask Assets:
- It had some strange behaviour like only
- It was based on Ruby SASS, which is slower to get new features than libsass,
and meant depending on Ruby, and having the SASS Gem globally installed—so
you’re already out of being a ‘pure’ Python app
- Martyn and I have experience of doing it this way on Marketplace, and we’ve
ironed out the initial rough patches
The specific technologies this introduces, all of which are Node-based:
- Gulp – like a Makefile written in Javascript
- NPM – package management, used for managing Gulp and its related dependencies
- Bower – also package management, and the only way I can think to have
GOV.UK template as a proper dependency
…speaking of which, GOV.UK template is now a dependency. This means it can’t be
modified at all (eg to add a global `#content` wrapper), so every page now
inherits from a template that has this wrapper. But it also means that we have a
clean upgrade path when the template is modified.
Everything else (toolkit, elements) I’ve kept as submodules but moved them to a
more logical place (`app/assets` not `app/assets/stylesheets`, because they
contain more than just SASS/CSS).
