* Updated header and footer
* Moved files around and updated gulpfile to correct the build process when it goes to production
* Updated fonts
* Adjusted grid templating
* Adding images to assets
* Updated account pages, dashboard, and pages in message sending flow
* Updated the styling for the landing pages in the account section once logged in
* Updated header and footer
* Updated fonts
* Moved files around and updated gulpfile to correct the build process when it goes to production
* Adjusted grid templating
* Added images to assets
* Update app/templates/components/uk_components/footer/template.njk
Co-authored-by: Steven Reilly <stvnrlly@users.noreply.github.com>
If there is whitespace in the element containing the value to be copied
then Firefox[1] includes that space in the value it puts in the clipboard.
This is obviously annoying since `foo-bar` might be a valid API key where
`foo-bar ` is not.
This commit fixes that by using the `-` in Jinja to gobble whitespace.
I also looked at doing this in the Javascript, but the browser API for
selecting some text and copying it doesn’t give an obvious place for
using `String.prototype.trim()`.
1. Tested with Firefox 100.0 on Mac OS 12.2.1
In user research we quite often saw people accidentally scroll the
branding preview `<iframe>` when trying to scroll the page.
This is suboptimal because they:
- were confused why the page wasn’t scrolling
- lost visibility of the branding they were trying to preview because
it scrolled outside the bounds of the `<iframe>`
This means we:
- don’t have to copy and paste the `<iframe>` code to every place where
we use it
- can make changes to it in one place and have it apply everywhere
The current updateContent JS replaces the in-page
HTML with the HTML from the server the first time
an AJAX request is fired, even if the HTML from
the server has no changes. This is because the
code that compares the two operates on two
different things:
The HTML in the page is the component HTML, with
all the data attributes and the partial HTML
(marked with the 'ajax-block-container' class) as
its first child:
```
<div data-module="update-content" data-url="...">
<div class="ajax-block-container">
...
</div>
</div>
```
The HTML from the server only contains the
partial:
```
<div class="ajax-block-container">
...
</div>
```
The diffing code just sees them as different at
the top level so replaces the page HTML with the
partial from the server. This means all subsequent
diffs are between partial HTML and partial HTML so
only update on actual changes.
These replace the component with the partial, as
part of the component initialising. This means all
code that runs on an AJAX response will only
compare like-for-like so will result in actual
changes (or none at all), not just swapping one
element out for another.
Note: this commit also removes the
aria-live="polite" from the ajax_block component.
It has always been overwritten by the first
response so never announces anything to assistive
technologies. Removing it makes this more clear.
The Siteimprove accessibility testing tool raised
an issue with our having a div with role=region in
the page that was:
- empty
- with no label
The status has a role of 'region' which makes it a
generic landmark. This means that, unlike <nav>
or <footer>, users don't get any hint of its
purpose from its HTML tag. If we did want this,
we'd have to give it a label to explain that.
I don't think we do want those things. I think
it's more of a sentence that sits between the
searchbox and the results, just saying how many
are there.
That being the case, we should just remove the
role. It's also what design system do with their
character count, which is similar:
https://design-system.service.gov.uk/components/character-count/
Unlike that component, I don't think we need to
use aria-describedby to set the status as the
description of the searchbox because it describes
the results, not the search term.
This hides the "Register" button and shows an error that's specific
to one of two ways a browser may not support WebAuthn:
- JavaScript is disabled (there's no possible fallback for this).
- WebAuthn API is not supported (e.g. on Internet Explorer).
We could add a similar check for the API in the JS code to handle
the button click, but hiding it seems like enough protection.
In order to avoid elements flashing when the page loads, this uses
a view macro to embed a script at the start of the body element,
which is the same approach used for the "js-enabled" class flag [1].
Tested with Chrome and IE 11.
[1]: https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-frontend/blob/main/src/govuk/template.njk#L31
The links in the blue boxes on the job page needed hidden text so that
they work out of context. This changes the text from "10 sending" to "10
sending text messages" (with the message type hidden text).
We feel that this is more appropriate because it’s part of the
information you’re agreeing to before you hit submit.
Sometimes users can missing information that doesn’t start left-aligned
to the column they’re interacting with.
It also makes it closer to the Design System component.
We’re keeping it in the sticky footer, so that it’s always visible no
matter where in the message you’re scrolled to (this means you won’t
have to edited to content then scroll down to check whether you’ve
made it fit).
This looks tidy, and because of the sticky footer it means the message
is always visible, even if your template is quite long. So no matter
where you’re scrolled to in the template you don’t have to scroll to the
bottom to see the count update.
As formatters we can use them in Jinja or Python code.
It also means we don’t need to import them every time we want to use
them – they’re always available in the template context.
For now this doesn’t remove the macros, it just aliases them to the
formatters. This gives us confidence that the formatters are working the
same way the old macros did, and reduces the diff size of each commit.
Looks like this was added in:
4a226a7a29
...and used in the spark_bar_field macro. That
macro was removed in:
89b88ee4cb
..but the import was missed out.
An accessiblity audit done as part of Notify's
service assessment raised the following problem
with our big_number component.
When you turn CSS off, the sentence in the
component is split onto separate lines.
This was because the number part is wrapped in a
<div> which browsers were interpreting as being a
separate sentence to the label.
So "1 letter", where "letter" is the label, was
seen as:
"1"
"letter"
The accessibility expert consulted on this pointed
out that this would sound confusing for users of
screen readers when moving through the document
sentence by sentence.
These changes:
- make the <div>s into <span>s which are 'phrasing
content' and so are interpreted as part of the
same sentence
- change the CSS so the number will still sit
on top of its label text
The HTML5 spec has a section on how browsers
should arrange text into paragraphs that explains
what was happening in more detail:
https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/dom.html#paragraphs
Safari has a bug where it stops input[type=file]
elements working if they don't specify the types
of file to accept (via the `accept` attribute).
It seems to just effect certain versions of Mojave
but completely blocks this action so worth fixing.
This adds a 'allowed_file_extensions' keyword
argument to the file_upload component to let you
specify a value to be passed to `accept`.
This was spotted on x-gov Slack:
https://ukgovernmentdigital.slack.com/archives/C06GCJW7R/p1607952390112800
...and StackOverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/q/64843459/679924
Our cookie banner has an accessible description
but no accessible name. It needs to have an
accessible name to distinguish it from other
elements on the page with role=region.
There's some advice in the WCAG guidance that
explains this more:
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/ARIA11.html
This issue was raised in the accessibility review
done as part of our service assessment.
These changes borrow the approach from www.gov.uk of
moving to a label and losing the accessible
description. It also uses the 'cookie banner'
label for consistency with www.gov.uk.
This change has been made because autofocus has been confusing
to users of screenreaders because they orient themselves by
what is in focus. Moving it when the page loads without warning
can cause confusion and mean they miss parts of the page
before the point focus has moved to.
So now we will only turn on autofocus if there are no other
elements in the page that need attention than the search box.
