In HTML you generally can’t nest an inline level element inside a block
level one, if you want your HTML to validate.
There were a couple of places where we were using a `<span>` as a
containing element:
- inside every table cell (think we inherited this from Digital
Marketplace)
- in the ‘pill’ navigation component for the selected tab
This meant that when we put components like big number inside these,
the resulting HTML was invalid, because big number is built with a bunch
of `<div>`s, which are block level.
This commit removes the use of a `<span>` tag in these places, and
replaces it with a `<div>`. Nesting block level elements in fine in
HTML.
Currently it’s not possible for a screen reader user to know which
financial year they’re looking at. From the accessibility report:
> The financial year links are contained in a navigation region -
> tabbing or arrowing through only reads out the links, not the main
> information of "2016 to 2017 financial year" - that information is
> vital for understanding the page content.
This problem also applies to other pages which use the `pill` component,
which is effectively tabbed navigation (that reloads the page rather
than showing or hiding content on the page).
There are specific ARIA attributes that can be used to mark up a
navigation as being tabbed. This commit:
- adds those attributes
- makes the selected ‘tab’ visible to screenreaders and keyboard
focusable
- adds a visual focus indicator to the selected tab
- adds `id`s to the parts of the page that are controlled by the tabs so
that they are labelled as such
This also means changing the pill component from being a `<nav>` to a
`<ul>` because `tablist` is not a valid `role` for a `nav`.
Mostly follows the example here:
http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/aria/examples/tabpanel2.shtml
It’s invalid HTML to have multiple labels nested within each other. This
was happening by accident because WTForms tries to be clever – when you
put `{{ field.label }}` in a template it prints a `<label>` tag for you,
not just the text of the label. But we put our own `<label>` tags in the
HTML to have more control of them.
This commit stops WTForms being so clever.
This is mainly for the ‘check’ page where we show users the contents of
their spreadsheet.
> The structure of the table means that the first cell is treated as a
> column header, so moving through columns in row 2 for example
> associates the data 2 with 1 (column header) - this has no logical
> meaning
> If both sections of the page have errors and the page is submitted,
> focus moves to the mobile numbers section so screen reader users may
> not be aware of preceding errors - focus should move to a dedicated
> error summary at the top of the page.
Right now we use Javascript to focus the first error on a page (if any
errors are found). This commit adds more JS to then focus the error
summary, if there is one on the page. So this is where the focus will
rest.
It also makes some modifications to the ‘dangerous’ banner to make it
focusable, and to visually indicate that it is focused.
Currently screen reader users would click the ‘Copy API key’ button but
not get any feedback. This commit adds an ARIA attribute which tells the
screenreader to announce any changes in to the content of the element
(eg when it changes from showing the API to showing the text ‘API key
copied to clipboard’).
Right now we tell people that the usage page is for the current
financial year. This is a lie – it’s for all time.
So this commit calls through to the API to get the stats for (by
default) the current financial year.
We already do this for the monthly breakdown, this just does the same
thing for the yearly totals.
It also adds navigation to show the data for other financial years:
- previous so you can go back and see your usage and verify that the
bill you’re about to pay is correct
- next so that you can check what your SMS allowance is going to be
before you actually get into it
Let users create/edit/delete letter templates.
Let them upload a CSV file or send a test against a letter template.
Big assumption at the moment is that addresses only have one line, and
therefore one column in the CSV file.
This is trying to resolve these confusions:
- that you’re in trial mode, which means you can’t have a live key yet (
or you can but it wont work, which is what we used to have)
- what does simulate mean
The create key page is the right place to resolve these confusions
because it’s where users are actively reading.
This commit also removes the trial mode banner from API integration
page because this where users _aren’t_ actively reading. A whole bunch
of users weren’t seeing this banner at all.
The implementation of the disabled API key options is kinda clunky
because WTForms doesn’t have a native way of doing this.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The options for scheduling a job by time should be grouped by day,
because a long list of 96 options is not very usable.
On the server side, this commit generates label for the next 4 days in
a friendly format (ie today/tomorrow/Sunday/Monday)
The Javascript component for choosing a time was built in a kind of
old-school jQuery way, where it manipulated the elements on the page.
The complexity of introducing groups of options was just too much for
this pattern, because it involves storing a lot of state in the DOM.
This commit completely rewrites the JS to:
- read the initial options and groups from the HTML and store them
in the object
- use Hogan to completely re-render the UI from a series of Mustache
templates, each of which represents a state of the UI and takes the
inital options and groups
- filter the choices to show when the today/tomorrow/… buttons are
clicked
The browser tries to be helpful by autofilling email addresses and
phone numbers. But it gets confused and tries to fill all the fields
with the same email address or phone number. This looks broken.
This commit disables autocomplete for these form fields.
Services who are in alpha or building prototypes need a way of sending
to any email address or phone number without having to sign the MOU.
This commit adds a page where they can whitelist up to 5 email addresses
and 5 phone numbers.
It uses the ‘list entry’ UI pattern from the Digital Marketplace
frontend toolkit [1] [2] [3].
I had to do some modification:
- of the Javascript, to make it work with the GOV.UK Module pattern
- of the template to make it work with WTForms
- of the content security policy, because the list entry pattern uses
Hogan[1], which needs to use `eval()` (this should be fine if we’re
only allowing it for scripts that we serve)
- of our SASS lint config, to allow browser-targeting mixins to come
after normal rules (so that they can override them)
This commit also adds a new form class to validate and populate the two
whitelists. The validation is fairly rudimentary at the moment, and
doesn’t highlight which item in the list has the error, but it’s
probably good enough.
The list can only be updated all-at-once, this is how it’s possible to
remove items from the list without having to make multiple `POST`
requests.
1. 434ad30791/toolkit/templates/forms/list-entry.html
2. 434ad30791/toolkit/scss/forms/_list-entry.scss
3. 434ad30791/toolkit/javascripts/list-entry.js
4. http://twitter.github.io/hogan.js/
On the dashboard:
- adds a new ‘in the next 24 hours’ section to the dashboard which lists
upcoming jobs
- tweaks some spacing on the dashboard so that it doesn’t look like too
much of a mess
- don’t show scheduled jobs in the table of normal jobs
On the jobs page:
- don’t show scheduled jobs
Users need to pick a time in the next 24hrs, or send a file immediately.
Rationale for this is a bit lost in time-before-holiday, but generally:
‘Now’ and ‘later’ as the inital choices makes it really clear what
this feature is about conceptually.
The choice of times is absolute, eg ‘1pm’ not ‘in 3 hours’
There’s no point in collapsing […] the email on the single template
page because it’s the only thing on the page.
Users will probably be going back and forth quite a bit to edit their
template and see the changes; they shouldn’t have to expanded it evey
time to check they’ve got the heading syntax right, for example.
The team page was a bit of a mess:
- invited and active tables didn’t line up
- lots of things were wrapping onto two lines
- the empty fields for when a user didn’t have permissions looked broken
This commit splits each row of the table (not actually a table any more)
onto two lines. First line has the user’s info, second has their
permissions and any associated actions.
This commit extends the `ajax_block` component to take a `dict` of
partials, from which it can select the partial matching its `key`
argument and print its HTML to the page.
This means that the same markup is only rendered in one place, rather
than in two (individually in the JSON endpoint and as `include`s in the
parent template).
This is less repetitive than typing out the HTML with all its attributes
every time.
It also lets us wrap up the idea of ‘finished’ as a parameter, so the
AJAX code will only be initiated when it’s needed, eg if a job is still
processing.
A long email message needs to be collapsed to only show the first few
lines. The problem is that we were doing this by adding a class with
Javascript, meaning that the email wasn’t being collapsed until the
script in the footer ran.
This caused a jump in the page because the browser was painting the
whole email message, then repainting it once it was collapsed.
This commit takes advantage of the `.js-enabled` class added to the
`<body>` by a script in the `<head>` of GOV.UK template.
This means that the email message is collapsed with CSS before the first
paint of the page, so no jump.
This introduces some complexity in how we determine which emails get the
expander toggle. Because they’re already collapsed we can’t get their
height and work out if they’re long enough to need collapsing.
So we need to take a copy of the message, put it off-screen, expand it,
get its height, then remove it from the DOM. Bit of a faff.
Because of this there’s still a quick flash of the toggle if you see an
email message that’s too short to need collapsing. I think this is the
lesser of two evils—very short email messages will be few and far
between in the real world.
These numbers don’t look very clickable white-on-black.
Blue is the colour of links, so lets see if they are more clickable in
blue.
The same clicking-a-big-number thing is also happening on the activity
page, so this commit also changes the activity page to look the same.
We can filter notifications on the activity page by state.
This commit adds counts to those filters.
This is mainly so that we can consistently do the same thing on the job
page later on.
With sending, delivered and failed all on one line there’s not much
space. When these numbers get relatively big (in the 000s) they can
start mushing into each other.
This commit makes them smaller so that they remain separate.
The first columns of our tables are always headings for the
subsequent columns, even though they go horizontally.
HTML has the `<th>` tag, which doesn’t just have to be used for headings
along the top of a table. So this commit changes the first column to be
a `<th>`.
This then allows us to style these elements differently, specifically
making them 50% wide. This makes pages like the dashboard align more
nicely.
Depends on:
- [ ] https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-utils/pull/40
In research we’ve noticed two problems with the appearance of
placeholders:
1. We are inconsistent about when we display the ((double brackets)).
Sometimes we show them, sometimes we don’t. This doesn’t help user’s
understanding about where the column names in their CSV file come
from, or how they can edit the template to fix any errors.
2. Because they look so different from normal `<textarea>` text, it’s
not immediately obvious that they can be edited just like normal
text. They look more like something that can be dragged/inserted.
So this commit:
1. Makes the brackets always-visible.
2. Makes the text colour of the placeholder `$text-colour`, and only
highlights the name of the ‘variable’, not the brackets themselves.
For the button on the check page, we need to be able to say ‘1 text message’ or
‘55 emails’. We already have the logic to do this on the dashboard (101 text
messages sent), and it’s already in a component. So this commit makes the check
page use the same component.
We have a couple of places now where we want nice lists made from `list`s, eg
- ‘name’, ‘date’ and ‘phone number’
- ((firstname)) ((lastname)) or ((date))
This commit adds a more generic component for doing this, which can handle:
- 1, 2, and n items
- comma (or other character) separated lists
- a conjunction between the last and one-before-last item
- characters to be inserted before and after each item, eg an opening and
closing HTML tag
It also pulls the `list_of_placeholders` component from the breaking change
page, and makes it use the `formatted_list` component under the hood.
