From the:
- dashboard
- activity page
This info will be confusing for users at the hack day, because it will say
they’ve already sent messages when they first sign up.
This involved changing the table macro to have a nice ‘no rows’ message.
This page is exactly the same as the page for adding your first service, save
the heading text.
So all this commit does is:
- set up two routes (`/add-service`, `/add-service/first`) for each of the two
journeys and change the existing journeys to use the `/add-service/first`
route
- add logic to show different heading text depending on the journey
- add a link to the new (`/add-service`) route in the service chooser dropdown
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
This is a link not a button because:
- it’s less prominent—delete is an infrequent action
- it’s a two-step process, and only the second part changes any data (so it has
a button)
Because a user can have multiple services, they need a way to navigate between
them. Normally they can use the ▶ Switcher to do this, except when:
- they first sign in
- they are on a page which isn’t associated with a service (eg user profile) in
which case we can’t use the switcher because it won’t know what the ‘current’
service is
So this commit adds a new page with a (fake) list of services.
This commit replaces the previous `StringField` used for collecting mobile
phone numbers with the `UKMobileNumber` field.
This means changing a few of the preexisting tests to have more realistic mobile
numbers so that they still pass.
This commit:
- improves the tests to check for specific error messages, rather than just
pass/fail
- makes the error messages more human, and more suggestive of what the user
needs to do to fix the error
This field does two things:
- validates the format of the phone number
- outputs a consistent representation of the phone number
Because of this I think it’s better represented as a new field type, rather
than individual validators.
I also think that it’s better to do this without regular expression(s), because
it makes returning the specific error easier.
This commit also adds basic pass/fail test for a series of valid/invalid
phone numbers.
This commit adds an extra page or field for confirming your current password
when making important changes
Name | Email address | Mobile number | Password
---------------------|-------------------|-------------------|------------
No password required | As second page | As second page | On same page as new password
This commit adds a page or series of pages for changing your:
Name | Email address | Mobile number | Password
------------------|-------------------|-------------------|------------
Enter new value | Enter new value | Enter new value | Enter new value
| Enter 2fa code | Enter 2fa code |
Return to profile | Return to profile | Return to profile | Return to profile
(each row is a page)
