There’s some weird interaction between the message attribute of the
exception and mocking.
Luckily there is an internal attribute – `_message` which doesn’t go
through all the magic.
Looks like `radio_button.text` no longer works. Probably a BeautifulSoup
change. More robust to look at the text of the label and the value of
the input anyway.
The Notify API client changed in version 4 to take two arguments, not
three (service ID was removed in favour of the combined API key).
This gets a bit gnarly because the API key has to be at least a certain
length so it can be substringed internally.
This was causing a 500 because of a bug in utils. It only occurred when
there was missing data for a cell in the recipient column. I’ve also
added a test for missing data in a non-recipient column just in case.
Previously we used AWS which meant that we could create wheels
from our requirements and then install them offline which made
deployments quicker.
We're no longer using AWS so let's remove that.
Although CloudFoundry supports installing dependencies in an offline
environment as documented here:
http://docs.cloudfoundry.org/buildpacks/python/#vendoring
To achieve this we create a vendor/ directory which will contain
the packages to install. This uses --no-index and --find-links so will
not resolve for any dependencies from pypi. For this reason there is
assumed confidence that the vendor/ directory will contain all
of the dependencies we need.
Google analytics lets you send:
- pageviews
- events
Page views are used by default. But sometimes you wanna count something
which isn’t the user navigating to a new page, or you wanna track
something which isn’t just what page they were looking it. This is where
events are useful.
This commit adds a small JS module that lets us fire off an event when
the presence of an element with the right data attributes are present on
the page.
The reason to indent the first column heading is so that the number 1
lines up with the numbers of subsequent rows.
This only happens when the subsequent rows are indented because of the
red bars. This is only when there are row errors, not when there are
more general errors.
There was a lot of repetetive wrapping code being repeated for every
conditional block in these files. Let’s wrap it around the whole
conditional bit once instead.
If you have errors in your file then there’s stuff you’re not going to
see on the page. So this doesn’t need to be in the Jinja templates that
are only used when there are errors.
Basically the conditional stuff is moving up to the level above these
templates.
Adds a new endpoint that works like view template/view preview of
letter, so that this page works the same way it does for emails/text
messages (ie showing the full content of the message, including
personalisation).
We’re not worrying about redaction in letters for now.
The status won’t ever change from sending for letters. For now at least.
And even when we do come up with more useful statuses I’m not convinced
it’s useful to expose them to our admin users.
A more useful piece of information to show is when we think the letter
will be delivered.
There’s no immediate feedback with letter jobs, unlike email or text
messages jobs where you see the numbers starting to tick over straight
away.
We need to reassure the user that the thing they asked us to do (send
letters) is underway. ‘Printing’ feels like the natural first state of
the letter-making process. So this commit adds a banner to tell the
user that printing is the thing that’s happening.
The sending/failed/delivered thing:
- doesn’t map to the actual states of letters
- doesn’t respond quickly enough to give you feedback that something is
happening (because "sending" doesn’t even go to "probably delivered"
for a few days)
This commit replaces these 4 boxes with some more useful information:
- one number – how many letters were in the job in total
- when we estimate that the letters will be delivered
The status for each letter in a job will be the same for every single
letter (at least until we start dealing with returns).
It’s redundant to show this information over and over again. This commit
removes it.
The idea is if you decide your problem isn’t such an emergency after
all, we direct you to the form where you can report it as such. This
link wasn’t working because it didn’t understand `False` to mean ‘not
severe’. Only ‘no’ means not severe.
The result was that users got sent in a bit of a convoluted loop
where they were asked again if their problem was an emergency or not.
Testing this by making sure that both:
- the URL in the link is what we expected
- when visited it gives the page title we expect
Because even if we had had the first test only, it wouldn’t have caught
this bug.
It will also be useful to know (especially for the API):
- when a letter was printed
- if it’s been printed or not
This commit:
- adds code to calculate these two pieces of information
- refactors the function to return a `namedtuple` – a tuple of two items
was manageable, but with four items it was getting hard to know what
each one meant – this lets us label each piece of information that is
being returned
