From the:
- dashboard
- activity page
This info will be confusing for users at the hack day, because it will say
they’ve already sent messages when they first sign up.
This involved changing the table macro to have a nice ‘no rows’ message.
This page is exactly the same as the page for adding your first service, save
the heading text.
So all this commit does is:
- set up two routes (`/add-service`, `/add-service/first`) for each of the two
journeys and change the existing journeys to use the `/add-service/first`
route
- add logic to show different heading text depending on the journey
- add a link to the new (`/add-service`) route in the service chooser dropdown
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
> it is about consistency and updates, if that endpoint changes in the future
> we don't have to update hundreds of tests for a specific string. The actual
> url should be ambiguous we are testing a view endpoint.
This is a link not a button because:
- it’s less prominent—delete is an infrequent action
- it’s a two-step process, and only the second part changes any data (so it has
a button)
Because a user can have multiple services, they need a way to navigate between
them. Normally they can use the ▶ Switcher to do this, except when:
- they first sign in
- they are on a page which isn’t associated with a service (eg user profile) in
which case we can’t use the switcher because it won’t know what the ‘current’
service is
So this commit adds a new page with a (fake) list of services.
This commit replaces the previous `StringField` used for collecting mobile
phone numbers with the `UKMobileNumber` field.
This means changing a few of the preexisting tests to have more realistic mobile
numbers so that they still pass.
This commit:
- improves the tests to check for specific error messages, rather than just
pass/fail
- makes the error messages more human, and more suggestive of what the user
needs to do to fix the error
This field does two things:
- validates the format of the phone number
- outputs a consistent representation of the phone number
Because of this I think it’s better represented as a new field type, rather
than individual validators.
I also think that it’s better to do this without regular expression(s), because
it makes returning the specific error easier.
This commit also adds basic pass/fail test for a series of valid/invalid
phone numbers.
This commit adds an extra page or field for confirming your current password
when making important changes
Name | Email address | Mobile number | Password
---------------------|-------------------|-------------------|------------
No password required | As second page | As second page | On same page as new password
This commit adds a page or series of pages for changing your:
Name | Email address | Mobile number | Password
------------------|-------------------|-------------------|------------
Enter new value | Enter new value | Enter new value | Enter new value
| Enter 2fa code | Enter 2fa code |
Return to profile | Return to profile | Return to profile | Return to profile
(each row is a page)
At the moment the file contents are not persisted by checked in
memory.
The first and last three records are show if all are valid.
If there are invalid rows, they are reported and the user is
prompted to go back and sort out upload file.
The storing of upload result (i.e. validation of file) in session
will be removed in next story which is about persisting of file
for later processing.
There are now quite a few frontend components in the app.
It’s good to have a reference for them to:
- document for developers what patterns are available and how they are used
- check for regressions
- when working on one variation of a pattern you can check that your changes
don’t break other variations of it
- when changing the arguments to a pattern you can check that this doesn’t
change the expected arguments already in use
This commit adds a single page (`/_styleguide`) which has examples of all the
patterns.
Which means the user will only be able to reset their password, and not sign-in.
Once the user resets the password the user state is set to active once more.
If the link is used a second time they will be redirected to the index page with a message
that the link in the email is not longer valid.
