Since we added template folders the templates page has had a ‘medium’
sized heading, where other pages have stuck with a ‘large’ size.
This commit rationalises the decision around which pages have which
heading size:
- ‘navigation’ pages (eg templates, team members, email reply to
addresses) have medium sized headings
- transactional pages (ie ones which have a green button) keep the
larger heading size
The Design System has standardised on back links being at the top of the
page, decorated with a small text-coloured arrow.
I think this makes more sense than having them at the bottom, because it
suggests, in some way, being able to go back before commiting to any of
the forms on the page. Whereas the things at the bottom of the page
should be performing actions on what’s in the page.
The reason for making this change now is that it de-clutters the area
around the green buttons. This was presenting a design challenge where
multiple levels of interaction were happening in the same form. Moving
these back links to the top of the page should mean that, in these
complicated forms, there’s one fewer thing to compete for the user’s
attention.
I’ve componentised this into a `page_header` macro so that the change is
easier to roll out and maintain.
When a user's email address is updated, we not allowing it to be changed
to a non-government email address. We now allow a non-gov email address
to be changed to another non-gov email address. Government email
addresses still cannot be changed to non-government email addresses.
Also fixes the link in the error message on the ChangeEmailAddress form -
this was being escaped before.
I think this is something we inherited from the Digital Marketplace
code. We only use this for organisation settings are the moment, but
the list markers are redundant because each item will never wrap onto a
new line; it will truncate instead. Still keeps a little sliver of
spacing just so it doesn’t look like a paragraph.
One of the simplest of our JavaScript files to
test how difficult this is.
Answer is not too bad and includes the file
needing a DOM to operate on and jQuery in the
global scope.
Every time someone adds a new service we ask them what kind of
organisation they work for.
We can look this up based on the user’s email address now. So we should
only ask the question if:
- we don’t know about the organisation
- or we haven’t set what type of organisation it is (this shouldn’t be
possible on productions because we’ve populated the column for all
existing organisations and it’s impossible to add a new one without
setting it
At the moment you have to wait for whoever you’ve invited to accept the
invitation before you can go live. Since this check is mainly for the
benefit of the service, not us, we should trust that people’s intentions
are good when they invite someone.
So this commit also checks the invited users when counting how many team
members a service has.
We shouldn’t be making services live without an agreement in place. In
order to have an agreement in place we need to know what organisation
operates the service.
If a service comes along but belongs to an organisation we don’t know
about then we should create that organisation. This commits removes the
link, which should force this to happen.
We’re deprecating storing the domain as text on a branding in favour of
a database relationship between branding and organisation.
We need to do this now in order to remove the validation on these fields
(which depends on the data in `domains.yml`)
Settings looked at `domains.yml` when users were making go live requests
or email branding requests.
This will allow us to remove the `domains.yml` file, by using
information about organisations that is now stored in the database
instead.
Returns the data calculated by the API. Stored in Redis against a
hardcoded key so that no-one hammering the home page is directly hitting
the database.
Dealing with users who request to go live but haven’t completed all the
steps still represents a significant support overhead for our team.
We’ve made some improvements to the percentage of incomplete requests
with a better page design, but ultimately because it still shows the
button people think it’s OK to press the button while some of the items
on the page still say [Not completed].
We can do this now because organisations are in the database, which
means we can mark the agreement signed as soon as we get it back,
without having to deploy code.
We should audit when a service manager changes a user profile that is not
their own. This can be recorded in our events table, which is currently
only used to record successful logins.
This adds two new types of event, `update_user_email` and
`update_user_mobile_number` which store the
- browser fingerprint
- IP address
- user id of the user being updated
- user id of the service manager making the change
- original email address and new email address (for `update_user_email`
events)
- original mobile number and new mobile number (for
`update_user_mobile_number` events)
Shows a count of how many folders that user can see - this doesn't do
anything smart with parent folder stuff, it's just "how many checkboxes
are ticked on the edit page".
* doesn't show if service has no folders
* doesn't show if service hasn't got folder permissions enabled
We keep getting people requesting branding when they already have the
branding they want set. Seems like they don’t realise we’re doing it
automatically. This might help.
