We want to set the metadata on a file when rendering the check page, but
not when rendering the preview of a letter. So let’s put the code that
does that only in the place where we’re rendering the check page. This
means not having to pass a variable around.
Refactoring only; no functional changes.
When you upload a CSV the check page takes the file name from the URL
and writes it to the S3 metadata for that file.
This also happens when you go to the .png version of this page.
The .png version of the page doesn’t have the filename in the URL. So it
re-writes the S3 metadata with an empty filename.
This means that all letter jobs sent recently have no file names. This
commit fixes this problem.
On the page where signed in users can download the agreement:
> The second sentence of that could probably just be 'You can [download
> a copy]'. And could go at the end of the previous paragraph. (We try
> to avoid 'here', and the 'if you need to' is probably unnecessary).
On the page where we give users a choice of agreement to sign:
> We could probably edit that callout down a bit to: '[Contact us] if
> you're not sure whether your organisation is a crown or non-crown
> body.'
>
> (Try to keep callouts to a single sentence if we can)
When you’re not signed in you can still have a service in your session.
But there’s no point trying to get to its dashboard until you’re signed
in – you’ll just be sent back to the ‘sign in’ page.
we're not actually looking at the detailed service aspects - just
the stats. We're doing this in three places:
* dashboard
* notification activity page
* when checking jobs to see if we're over the daily limit
change these places to use a new api endpoint (service/id/statistics),
which hopefully be a little more performant, and will definitely be a
little more organised - moving away from generic endpoints with loads
of optional parameters.
We still need the detailed endpoints for the platform admin page tho.
Depends on https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-api/pull/1865
Currently we have a bunch of users who aren’t signed in asking us for
the agreement.
This is bad because:
- it’s slower (for them) than just being able to download it
- it creates work for us
We can’t just offer the agreement to anyone, but we can offer to it to
anyone who’s signed in because we now let people self-select which
version to download when we can’t tell which one to give them.
If we don’t know whether people belong to a crown organisation we should
give them the option of self-selecting, because they might themselves
know.
This commit adds a new version of the ‘agreement’ page which gives
people exactly that choice. It doesn’t link to it yet.
If we know the code won’t pass the validation on the API side, we might
as well tell the user before even passing it to the API.
So this commit:
- adds some more validators to the field
- rewrites the validation function on the form to actually call the
field-level validators before hitting the API 🤦♂️
- refactors the tests to be parametrize, which means they can be
shorter, easier to read, and more comprehensive
