The CDN URLs aren’t in included in the content security policy. So
browsers will refuse to load them.
This commit:
- adds each of the CDN URLs to the
- only prepend URLs in CSS files with `/static/` if we’re running
locally (because the CDN URLs are like `static.example.com` not
`example.com/static`)
Since you can now see them when searching you should also be able to
select and move them. Which means that they needed to be included in
the `Form`’s list of possible choices of things to move.
If you have a folder structure like this:
> FA / FB / FC
and you search for ‘FA’, it’s very noisy to see:
> FA / FB
> FA / FB / T1
> FA / FB / T2
> FA / FB / FC
> FA / FB / FC / T3
> …
It’s clearer to just show:
> FA / FB
This also has the benefit of, if you type ‘template’ (for example) you
don’t get every item any more, because it’s only looking at the name of
the thing. It used to look at the entire description, ie:
> A / B / C / Example
> Text message template
Now it only searches on the name:
> A / B / C / *Example*
> Text message template
Things in subfolders need to be in the page so we can search for them.
But the default view should be only the things are the current level.
So we can use CSS to hide items that are below the current level.
So that the live search can filter things, they need to be on the page
when it loads. We want to make search work across folders, so all the
things in subfolders need to be in the page.
They also need the full path appending to them, so that you can tell
which ones are in which folders.
This won’t show items that are in a folder above the one you’re
currently in – my reckon is that when you’re narrowing down by clicking
into a folder that you only want to search for things in that folder.
The Jinja template for the ‘choose templates’ page is now pulling in
data from a lot of diparate places in order to work out what to show. As
we add more logic about what to show (in order to make the live search
work) it’s going to get harder to have all this logic in the Jinja
template.
This commit refactors it back into Python where we have more language
features for managing complex logic.
It’s a bit weird to call this file a model, in that it’s dealing with
some presentational logic, rather than just data. Conceptually it’s more
like a view model[1].
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel
Don’t think it’s necessary. Makes things consistent with the sent letter
page, which only says ‘Download as a PDF’.
This inconsistency would be more glaring now these pieces of text appear
in the same place, in adjacent steps of a journey.
It was looking at the count of items at the root level (because it was
passing `parent_folder_id=None` as an argument).
This changes it to look at the total count of items for a service (which
was the intended behaviour).
If the folder is completely empty, always say ‘This folder is empty’, so
we don’t suggest that you can click around and find other things.
If the current view is filtered, but there are templates available in
other filters, say ‘There are no text message templates in this folder’
to make it clear why you can’t see anything.
Currently if there’s nothing in a folder you just get an empty page.
This looks a bit broken, or like the page hasn’t finished loading.
This commit adds a message to the page to show that it’s intentionally
blank.
The message is contextual based on type of template, because there might
be templates in the current folder, even if you can’t see them at the
moment (because you’re filtering).
It’s weird that this page changes when you click delete – it looks like
you’re going to a different page.
It should feel like you’re on the same page, just with the confirmation
message.
The problem we had before is that the rename form would `POST` to
`…/delete`, which would then delete the template instead of updating
its name.
We can fix this by explicitly setting the `action` attribute on the
rename form to always post to `…/manage`, even if the user is currently
looking at the `…/delete` page.
This makes the display of folders in the `<h1>` look like the prototype.
It alters the behaviour we’ve initially built here by only ever showing
a maximum of two levels of hierarchy (the current folders and its
parent).
When we first built letters you could only send them via a CSV upload, initially we needed a way to send those files to dvla per job.
We since stopped using this page. So let's delete it!
If the user is looking at the notifications page for all message types
(which is what we show ‘caseworkers’) then it doesn’t make sense to ask
the API for the data retention period for that message type (because
it will be `None`). Doing so causes the API to return a `404`, which
then causes the admin app to return `404`.
Passing through `None` as the value of limit days will just cause the
API to return everything in the `notifications` table, which is fine
for us.
Some users are bookmarking the sign in page for quick access to their
Notify service.
If they’re already signed in when they used this bookmark they get
redirected. However the redirect isn’t very smart, because it just takes
them to their list of services. This isn’t great if they only have one
service.
This commit redirects them to the `show_accounts_or_dashboard` endpoint
instead, which does the work to figure out which page is most useful
to show someone when they sign in.
Also changing this for `/register`, although it’s less likely that
someone will have bookmarked this page.
Often people will be editing the existing name, not changing it
completely.
This matches what we do when someone wants to rename their template or
service.
In multiple user research sessions we’ve noticed people edit the
auto-generated template name to put something at the end of it.
This is fiddly because of the quotes we put around the name:
> Copy of ‘Exiting template’
It also means that if they keep our prefix then the template doesn’t
sort alongside the one it’s replacing.
This commit changes the name of copied templates to better match the
behaviour our users are showing.
Also adds a bit of auto numbering, just as a nice detail.
