The endpoint was removed, but was still linked to in a couple of
places. Some old links were no longer needed, so have been removed.
We do still need a link to `add_template_by_type` on the 'Choose reply'
page - this page is used to allow to let someone pick a template to
reply to inbound SMS with. Since the link only appears if they have no
SMS templates, we now link to `.choose_template` with the templates and
folders form already opened at the option to add a template.
Makes sure the tabindex we add for focusing is
removed.
Also removes the outer fieldset from the radios
for new templates. We don't wrap form buttons in
fieldsets anywhere else and it doesn't add any
useful semantics to the form.
To match the call to action on the template page.
Karl said:
> I feel good about it. You're not really editing it so much as choosing between 2 options. It feels more human.
>
> I think it only started out as edit to match all the other sections of the letter – it certainly wasn't given any real consideration.
It’s a bit rudimentary to only show the current place in the hierarchy
and the parent. You lose a sense of how deep you are.
But we can’t just show the full path, because it can be arbitrarily
long. So what this commit does is show the full path, but truncates the
display of any items. Further-up than the current folder or its parent.
This also helps disambiguate between folders and templates, because
folders are always shown with the folder icon.
This probably won’t affect many teams, because we don’t anticipate a lot
of deep nesting.
We already have a pattern for navigation folders and searching for
templates – let’s use it for the copy page too. And I reckon we can
represent services as folders if the user has multiple services they
could copy a template from.
It’s confusing to have one way of adding things when your service is new
(green button) but a different way once you’ve added your first thing
(the new grey buttons).
For services that have a `edit_folders` permission, this commit
standardises on the grey buttons for a consistent experience.
so that they better align with the front-end, where they'll be used in
data attributes. Also, making the kebab case is nice because it doesn't
give favouritism to either JS or python naming conventions
Since we’re letting users add new folders directly from the choose page
it makes sense that they should also be able to add templates from
there.
This resolves the problem we saw in user research where people found it
hard to know where to go to add a new folder when they were all behind
one green button.
Since you can now see them when searching you should also be able to
select and move them. Which means that they needed to be included in
the `Form`’s list of possible choices of things to move.
The Jinja template for the ‘choose templates’ page is now pulling in
data from a lot of diparate places in order to work out what to show. As
we add more logic about what to show (in order to make the live search
work) it’s going to get harder to have all this logic in the Jinja
template.
This commit refactors it back into Python where we have more language
features for managing complex logic.
It’s a bit weird to call this file a model, in that it’s dealing with
some presentational logic, rather than just data. Conceptually it’s more
like a view model[1].
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel
It was looking at the count of items at the root level (because it was
passing `parent_folder_id=None` as an argument).
This changes it to look at the total count of items for a service (which
was the intended behaviour).
In multiple user research sessions we’ve noticed people edit the
auto-generated template name to put something at the end of it.
This is fiddly because of the quotes we put around the name:
> Copy of ‘Exiting template’
It also means that if they keep our prefix then the template doesn’t
sort alongside the one it’s replacing.
This commit changes the name of copied templates to better match the
behaviour our users are showing.
Also adds a bit of auto numbering, just as a nice detail.
This commit adds logic to:
- take the list of selected folders and templates
- split it into two lists (of folders and templates)
- `POST` that data to the API, to effect the movement of said folders
and templates
I’ve tried to architect it in such a way that we can easily add more
template ‘operations’ in the future, as we add more forms to the choose
template page.
This commit adds:
- checkboxes to let you select a template or folder
- radio buttons to let you select where to move those template(s) and/or
folder(s) to
It only does the `get` part of this work; handling the `post` and
calling API will be done in a subsequent commit.
It would be quite easy to dissociate the search box from the things its
supposed to be searching.
This commit adds assertions to make sure that the things the search box
is targeting are on the page
This means we can have a method on the service model which hits the API
(or Redis) but can be called multiple times (within the context of a
request) without making multiple network requests.
It does this by storing the results of the method on the object’s
internal `__dict__` the first time the method is called.
We were taking letters away from basic view because there’s no one-off
sending of letters.
But now that basic view isn’t an opt-in thing but something we’re
rolling out to all users who only have the ‘send’ permission it feels
like too drastic a change to remove letters.
