At present the file-list pattern assumes each
item has hint text below the link and so increases
the hit area to overlap the hint. This adds a
variant for items without one and uses it on the
page for choosing an alert sub-area.
Following a team cuddle where we checked how different people
interpret the billing report. We found that some things about
the report are ambiguous and that it would be helpful to have
some guidance on the page where the report can be downloaded,
As with the last update, the work prepping the
interface that will be used for emergency alerts
for its accessibility audit took priority and has
taken longer than expected. Because of this, we
haven't had time to work on the issues listed
here.
This updates the planned timings to reflect what
we now believe will be possible with the work left
on emergency alerts and amount of work required to
fix them.
This was a minor issue in a recent incident [1].
We don't want people emailing us directly:
- It's harder to collaborate on replies than in Zendesk, where I
can see who's editing.
- We can't take advantage of macros like we can in Zendesk.
- People emailing us directly creates an unnecessary distraction
and it's easy to lose track. We want to minimise distractions in
an incident situation.
- We use notify-support@ for monitoring, so we don't want noise.
[1]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eArpcYoCmhlgB45FZpGj1_HnkAgpgtgwr-KBiUq7h8c/edit#
This adds a link next to the organisation team members which lets
them be removed from the organisation. Service team members have
their own page and the link to remove them appears there. For
organisation team members, we don't currently have any other
information we want to show or any other actions to perform. As
a result, this change uses the 'Team members' page to show the
confirmation banner.
The endpoint called 'edit_user_org_permissions' was renamed to
'edit_organisation_user' and some of the existing code around deleting
org users (which didn't work) was changed.
Note that this is copied from the same change made to the rename service
page:
1190e4541b
The original idea behind was to always ask users to re-enter their
password any time:
- we want them to be sure that they want to do what they’re about to do
- we want to be sure it’s really the user trying to do the thing (and
not someone malicious)
In reality we:
- removed this from the initial place it was added (a descendent of the
‘suspend service’ feature)
- only ever added it to the ‘rename service’ and ‘rename organisation’
features
So in reality it’s not a pattern we have persisted with. Arguably there
are several things you can now do in the admin app without re-entering
your password which are much more high consequence than changing the
service name.
Also, with browser autofill there’s a lot less chance that forcing
someone to re-enter a password really gives much defence against an
unattended laptop, for example.
So this commit removes the need to re-enter your password when renaming
an organisation.
We have a `client_request` fixture which does a bunch of useful stuff
like:
- checking the status code of the response
- returning a `BeautifulSoup` object
Lots of our tests still use an older fixture called `client`. This is
not as good because it:
- returns a raw `Response` object
- doesn’t do the additional checks
- means our tests contain a lot of repetetive boilerplate like `page = BeautifulSoup(response.data.decode('utf-8'), 'html.parser')`
This commit converts all the tests which had a `client.get(…)` or
`client.post(…)` statement to use their equivalents on `client_request`
instead.
Subsequent commits will remove uses of `client` in other tests, but
doing it this way means the work can be broken up into more manageable
chunks.
