My local build was not always getting the optional requirement for the jsonschema uri format checker (rfc3987).
The requirement has been added to the requirements_for_test file.
I changed the tests to validate the response schema from the post_notifications tests, this way we can tell if we are breaking the contract.
This showed that the email_from was not returning the entire email address but just the username, that has been corrected here.
Removed the response schema validation tests since they are not being testing in the post notification tests.
Added a validation method that always fails for scheduled notifications.
Comment out config for scheduled task.
The schedule notifications will be turned on once we can invite services to use it.
Waiting for the service permission story, must commit this in order to keep things from going stale.
jsonschema states:
> A format attribute can generally only validate a given set of
> instance types. If the type of the instance to validate is not in
> this set, validation for this format attribute and instance SHOULD
> succeed.
We were not checking for the type of the input, and our validators were
behaving in unexpected manners (throwing TypeErrors etc etc). Despite
us declaring that the phone_number field is of type `str`, we still
need to make sure the validator passes gracefully, so that the inbuilt
type check can be the bit that catches if someone passes in a non-str
value. We've seen this with people passing in integers instead of strs
for phone numbers. This'll make them receive a nice 400 error
(e.g. "phone_number 12345 is not of type string"), rather than us
having a 500 internal server error
brings in a fix to InvalidEmail/Phone/AddressExceptions not being
instantiated correctly. `exception.message` is not a python standard,
so we shouldn't be relying on it to transmit exception reasons -
rather we should be using `str(exception)` instead. This involved a
handful of small changes to the schema validation
The new 'v2' API wants to return less data than the previous one,
which was sending back tons of fields the clients never used.
This new route returns only useful information, with the JSON
response dict being built up in the model's `.serialize()` method.
Note that writing the test for this was a bit painful because of
having to treat loads of keys differently. Hopefully we think this
is a good way to write this test, because if we don't, we should
start thinking of a better way to check the values are what we
expect.
In the V2 API, the GET response for an individual notification
returns a 'cost' value, which we can get by multiplying the
billable units by the per-message rate of the supplier who
sent the message.
Any notifications with billable units > 0 but without a
corresponding `ProviderRates` entry will blow up the application,
so make sure you've got one.
Update the format_checkers to raise the specific exception that why the validator can handle multiple messages.
Which led to a refactor of build_error_message.
