Previously these metrics weren't very useful because they could be
skewed by long timings for failed notifications, which can take up
to 72 hours to deliver. I'm intentionally not trying to have a dual
running period (with the old and new names) because:
- We don't use the current stats for anything (checking Grafana).
- The current stats get turned into a "bucket" metric in Prometheus
[1][2], which isn't very useful because it can only tell us the mean
time to deliver, but we're actually interested in percentiles.
Switching to a new naming is an opportunity to fix the raw data and
the way it's aggregated, using the same kind of "summary" metric that
we now use for stats about our Celery tasks [3].
[1]: c330a8ac8a/paas/statsd/statsd-mapping.yml (L82)
[2]: https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/histograms/#quantiles
[3]: https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-aws/pull/890
us not recognising a code or provider not having sent the detailed
status.
It seems like Firetext is sometimes sending us permanent-failure
without detailed status. It could be due to:
- them really not sending any detailed status
- them sending a status code we don't recognise
- them sending 000 code that means 'no errors', which we ignore
To see which one it is, and to debug such issues quicker in the
future, this PR adds status and detailed status codes to the logs.
Also log detailed delivery status for firetext in the same place in addition
to it being logged from notifications_dao.
Logging detailed delivery statuses will help us see why messages
fail to deliver. In the future we could persist detailed delivery
status in the database.
This runs on the new `sms-callbacks` queue. The function
`process_sms_client_response` has been replaced with a task called
`process_sms_client_response`. This involved some reorganisation of the
existing code and tests.
