Previously we were doing it based on their email address. This will also
apply it if they self-select as a GP surgery, even if they don’t have an
NHS email address.
Although their allowances are the same as what we call `nhs_local` it
makes more sense to store them separately because:
- we already present them as two separate choices to the user
- we may want to handle them differently in the future, eg in terms of
what branding choices are available to them
This table is no longer used or referenced in the code.
We can remove this mapping table now that the organisation to service relationship is handled by the foreign key in Services.
This is the second commit in the series to add organisation_id to Service.
- Data migration to update services.organisation_id from data in organisation_to_service
(The rollback will lose any updates to organisation unless the script is updated to set organistion_to_service from service.organisation_id )
- Update Service.organisation relationship to a ForeignKey relationship to Organisation.
- Update Organisation.services to a backref relationship to Service.
- Add oranisation_id to Service data model.
- Update methods to create service and associate service to organisation to set the organisation_id on the Service.
- Create the missing test, if the service user email matches a domain for an organisation then associate the service to the organisation and inherit crown and organisation_type from the organisation.
we build up one personalisation dict, and then pass it in to all the
different templates - so be careful editing things. also of note, we
check if the agreement_signed_on_behalf_of is set, and send a different
template with slightly different wording to the person who clicked the
confirm button.
At the moment this response returns a list of service IDs for hundreds
of organisations.
The admin app doesn’t use this information, but having to wait for it to
be serialized and sent across the network slows it down all the same.
This is changing because we’re going to introduce accepting contracts
and MoUs online.
Previously
---
We had one column for who signed the agreement, which is foreign keyed
to the user table. This is still relevant, because there will always be
a user who is clicking the button.
Now
---
We add two new fields for the name and email address of the person on
whose behalf the agreement is being accepted. This person:
- is different from the one signing the agreement
- won’t necessarily have a Notify account
For a user to be able to be archived, each service that they are a
member of must have at least one other user who is active and who has
the 'manage-settings' permission.
To archive a user we remove them from all their services and
organisations, remove all permissions that they have and change some of
their details:
- email_address will start with '_archived_<date>'
- the current_session_id is changed (to sign them out of their current
session)
- mobile_number is removed (so we also need to switch their auth type to
email_auth)
- password is changed to a random password
- state is changed to 'inactive'
If any of the steps fail, we rollback all changes.
go_live_user_id: is the user that requested the service to go live
go_live_at: is the DateTime the service went live.
There will be a data migration from the beta partners spreadsheet to back fill the data.
This relationship is via the `Organisation` now; we don’t use this
column to fudge a relationship based on the user’s email address and the
matching something in these columns.
Needed to update old migration scripts so that the email_branding name is not null when creating the test dbs.
This should no affect the migrations elsewhere.
Sometimes we have to make a few services for what really is one
service, for example GOV.UK Pay and GOV.UK Pay Direct Debit. We also
have our own test services which aren’t included in the count of live
services. We currently count these as one service by not including them
in the beta partners spreadsheet.
This adds a column to mark such services as ‘not counted’, which can
later be used to exclude them from reporting.
Now that notifications-admin is always sending through
folder_permissions, the folder_permissions column of the invited_user
table can be made non-nullable. The migration also backfills the column
(to []) to account for existing null values.
Added a new JSONB column, folder_permissions, to the invited_users table
to store a list of folders that an invited user can see. This is
nullable for now, but will be changed to be non-nullable and
back-populated later.
Currently we have
- a thing in the database called an ‘organisation’ which we don’t use
- the idea of an organisation which we derive from the user’s email
address and is used to set the default branding for their service and
determine whether they’ve signed the MOU
We should make these two things into one thing, by storing everything
we know about an organisation against that organisation in the database.
This will be much less laborious than storing it in a YAML file that
needs a deploy every time it’s updated.
An organisation can now have:
- domains which we can use to automatically associate services with it
(eg anyone whose email address ends in `dwp.gsi.gov.uk` gets services
they create associated to the DWP organisation)
- default letter branding for any new services
- default email branding for any new services
It should be nullable so we can tell whether someone has answered the
question already or not.
No real users have entered data into this column yet, so it’s fine to
wipe it.
Changed the user_to_service mapping table into a model called
ServiceUser. When looking at users who have permission for a folder
we are only interested in users for a particular service, not all users,
so we can use the ServiceUser model to access folder permissions.
Added a user_folder_permissions table which contains the service_id,
user_id and template_folder_id. There are links between
user_folder_permissions and TemplateFolder, and between
user_folder_permissions and ServiceUser.
It makes most sense to collect this at the same time as the estimated
volumes. Which means we need to store it somewhere; we can’t put it
straight into the ticket.
This will make it easier to do analysis on the data. Almost all users
are submitting data in a numerical format now anyway, because we ask the
question in a sensible way.
When a service go live we ask people for their estimated sending
volumes. At the moment we only put this in the ticket, and store it in
a spreadsheet.
This means that a service can
- say they want to go live
- say they are sending 100,000 emails per year
- not have created any email templates
- still see ‘create templates’ as ‘completed’ in the go live checklist
If we store this data against the service we can collect it earlier, and
then use it to determine automatically what kind of templates the user
needs to create before their go live checklist can be considered
complete.
