This changeset pulls in all of the notification_utils code directly into the API and removes it as an external dependency. We are doing this to cut down on operational maintenance of the project and will begin removing parts of it no longer needed for the API.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Costino <carlo.costino@gsa.gov>
https://marshmallow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/upgrading.html#schemas-are-always-strict
`.load` doesn't return a `(data, errors)` tuple any more - only data is
returned. A `ValidationError` is raised if validation fails. The code
now relies on the `marshmallow_validation_error` error handler to handle
errors instead of having to raise an `InvalidRequest`. This has no
effect on the response that is returned (a test has been modified to
check).
Also added a new `password` field to the `UserSchema` so that we don't
have to specially check for password errors in the `.create_user` endpoint
- we can let marshmallow handle them.
having `/invite/service/<token>` and `/invite/service/<id>` as two
separate routes (the first to validate an invite token, the second to
retrieve invite metadata) technically works. Routes are matched from
first to last until a match is found. The metadata endpoint only accepts
UUIDs, so requests with a UUID will be picked up by the correct
endpoint, while requests that don't look like a UUID will carry on
searching for an endpoint, and will find the token validation endpoint.
So while this works correctly for our normal expected input, it only
does so _because the UUID endpoint is first in the file_. This isn't
great, and it makes it harder to reason about the URLs when looking at
them.
To solve this, create the new `invite/service/check/<token>` endpoint.
For backwards compatibility, assign this in parallel with the existing
route - once the admin uses the new route we can remove the old route
and make better guarantees about what endpoint is being hit.
nb: the routes are not changing as part of this, only file paths and
blueprint names.
invite -> service_invite
this blueprint handles fetching invites for a service, creating invites,
etc.
accept_invite -> global_invite
this blueprint handles accepting invites for now, but will also involve
retrieving service/org user invite data without knowing the service/org
id associated. i'm not in love with this name and open to suggestions,
but i wanted to contrast it from service_invite and
organisation/invite_rest.py.
