These tasks need to repeatedly get the same template and service from
the database. We should be able to improve their performance by getting
the template and service from the cache instead, like we do in the REST
endpoint code.
Flake8 Bugbear checks for some extra things that aren’t code style
errors, but are likely to introduce bugs or unexpected behaviour. A
good example is having mutable default function arguments, which get
shared between every call to the function and therefore mutating a value
in one place can unexpectedly cause it to change in another.
This commit enables all the extra warnings provided by Flake8 Bugbear,
except for:
- the line length one (because we already lint for that separately)
- B903 Data class should either be immutable or use `__slots__` because
this seems to false-positive on some of our custom exceptions
- B902 Invalid first argument 'cls' used for instance method because
some SQLAlchemy decorators (eg `declared_attr`) make things that
aren’t formally class methods take a class not an instance as their
first argument
It disables:
- _B306: BaseException.message is removed in Python 3_ because I think
our exceptions have a custom structure that means the `.message`
attribute is still present
Matches the work done in other repos:
- https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-admin/pull/3172/files
This code is already restricted to SMS and email, so this is only to make it obvious if there is a code refactor down the line. Perhaps this is overkill and we back out this commit.
When we initially added a new task to persist the notifications for a high volume service we wanted to implement it as quickly as possible, so ignored SMS.
This will allow a high volume service to send SMS, the SMS will be sent to a queue to then persist and send the SMS, similar to emails.
At this point I haven't added a new application to consume the new save-api-sms-tasks. But we can add a separate application or be happy with how the app scales for both email and sms.
Years ago we started to implement a way to schedule a notification. We hit a problem but we never came up with a good solution and the feature never made it back to the top of the priority list.
This PR removes the code for scheduled_for. There will be another PR to drop the scheduled_notifications table and remove the schedule_notifications service permission
Unfortunately, I don't think we can remove the `scheduled_for` attribute from the notification.serialized method because out clients might fail if something is missing. For now I have left it in but defaulted the value to None.
Same as we’re doing for templates.
This means avoiding a database call, even for services that don’t hit
our API so often.
They’ll still need to go to the database for the API keys, because we’re
not comfortable putting the API key secrets in Redis.
But once a service has got its keys from the database we commit the
transaction, so the connection can be freed up until we need it again to
insert the notification.
Same as we’ve done for templates.
For high volume services this should mean avoiding calls to external
services, either the database or Redis.
TTL is set to 2 seconds, so that’s the maximum time it will take for
revoking an API key or renaming a service to propagate.
Some of the tests created services with the same service ID. This
caused intermittent failures because the cache relies on unique service
IDs (like we have in the real world) to key itself.
By serialising these straight away we can:
- not go back to the database later, potentially closing the connection
sooner
- potentially cache the serialised data, meaning we don’t touch the
database at all
For some reason our V1 get template response wraps the whole template in
a dictionary with one key, `'data'`:
0d99033889/app/template/rest.py (L166)
That means when the admin app caches the response it also caches it in
this format.
The API needs to do the same, otherwise it will be cacheing data with a
schema that the admin app isn’t expecting, and vice-versa.
In the previous PR I removed the `update_notification` method to reduce the need for another update query. However, that meant the notification was marked as delivered without an updated_at timestamp.
It is weird to set the updated_at when we create the notification. So is this a better fix? Or do I put the update back now?
I recommend we push this fix now.
After the commit we issue two calls to the db to get service and get notification. This is because after the commit the ORM wants to ensure that the data model objects are the latest.
So far this is just a proof of concept, but the letter flow needs to be updated and we should be able to get rid of research mode. And it needs some tidy up.
For services that have permission to send international letters we
should not reject letters that are addressed to another country. We
should still reject letters that are badly-addressed.
This is part of moving away from `postcode` and towards `address line 7`
We think it will be easier for people to map their existing data to our
API if we let them fill in any 3 lines, instead of requiring at least
1, 2, and postcode specifically.
We don’t need to reformat the postcode here once template preview takes
care of it when rendering the PDF.
It’s better (and less code) to store what people give us, so we give
them back the same thing.
SQS fails if the message body is over 256kb. Normally our messages are
quite small, but if we're using the new save-api-email task with an
email that has a large body, we can get over that limit. If so, handle
the exception and fall back to the existing code path (saving to the
database and sending a deliver-email task, which only has a notification
id.
