- pass new, sanitised pdf for sending
- move invalid pdfs to a newly created bucket
- set status fro notifications that failed pdf validation to a new status validation-failed
- adjust existing tests
Added a filename column to the dvla_organisation table and populated it
with the filenames that are currently hard-coded in template-preview.
The filenames for letter logos are going to be stored in the database,
instead of in template-preview.
We want to bring the start dates for first class letter rates forward by
a month so that we don't see billing errors when sending first class letters now.
(The feature will still go live at the planned time - this is to let us test things
beforehand.)
we had an issue where the notification postage constraint command ran
into a deadlock, after trying to acquire two exclusive access locks on
large frequently modified/read tables.
To avoid this happening, we've had to split the upgrade script into
three - one script to apply the not-valid constraint to notifications
table, one for notification_history, and a third to validate the two
constraints.
Note: The first two scripts acquire exclusive access locks, but the
third only needs a row by row lock.
since this involves changing the exsiting alembic upgrades, if you've
upgraded your db you'll need to run the following three commands to
revert your database to a previous good state.
```
alter table notifications drop constraint chk_notifications_postage_null;
alter table notification_history drop constraint chk_notification_history_postage_null;
update alembic_version set version_num = '0229_new_letter_rates';
```
There are two fun quirks of postgres/sql that we need to work around:
* any `x = y` where x or y is NULL returns NULL, rather than false.
* check constraints accept NULL or true values as good.
so, the check `postage in ('first', 'second')` returns `null` rather
than `false` when postage is null itself. This surprisingly passes the
check constraint. To get around this, we have to add an explicit not
null check as well.
A not valid constraint only checks against new rows, not existing rows.
We can call VALIDATE CONSTRAINT against this new constraint to check
the old rows (which we know are good, having run the command from
74961781). Adding a normal constraint acquires an ACCESS EXCLUSIVE
lock, but validate constraint only needs a SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock.
see 9d4b8961 and 0a50993f for more information on marking constraints
as not valid.
To start with this will be an attribute on the service, at the time the notification is created it will look at Service.letter_class to decide what class to use for the letter.
This PR adds Service.letter class as a nullable column.
Updated the create_service and update_service method to default the value to second.
Subsequent PRs will add the check constraint to ensure we only get first or second in the letter_class column and make that column nullable.
This can't be done all at once because it will cause an error if someone inserts or updates a service during the deploy.
We need to update letter notifications with a new status when DVLA
gives us a list of references for returned letters.
This adds the new status to the models and the DB.
DVLA call this 'returned mail', so I'm using it as the status name
since it seems less ambiguous than 'returned'.
Does two things:
1. Revert "Revert "Add unique constraint to email branding domain""
This reverts commit af9cb30ef3.
2. Don’t allow empty string in email branding domain
Columns with multiple `null`s can have a uniqueness constraint. Columns
with multiple empty string values are not considered unique.
This commit:
- removes any duplicate empty string values
- casts empty strings to null string any time these columns are updated
---
Squashed into this single commits because these two things are not
atomic as individual commits.
Brandings with a domain set should be considered canonical. It doesn’t
make sense to have the same domain set on multiple different email
brands – you can’t tell which one to use.
‘GOV.UK’ doesn’t make sense as a type of brand. It only made sense as
a type of branding that a service had.
Since we’ve:
- deprecated the service branding column
- made sure it’s not used as a value in the email branding table
we can remove this value from the table of possible brand types.
We’ve already removed all the `null` values, and made it impossible to
add new brandings with a `null` brand type.
Making it a database constraint just gives us extra safety.
So later we can:
- make it non-nullable later
- remove `govuk` as an option
This is mostly for people’s local databases, the manual work here has
been done on production already.
The admin app still needs to use the name column.
Add the text field to the post data schemas.
If the text is not in the post data, then populate it with the data in the name field.
This should make the migration to text easier, and will work until we are able to update the admin app.
