jsonschema states:
> A format attribute can generally only validate a given set of
> instance types. If the type of the instance to validate is not in
> this set, validation for this format attribute and instance SHOULD
> succeed.
We were not checking for the type of the input, and our validators were
behaving in unexpected manners (throwing TypeErrors etc etc). Despite
us declaring that the phone_number field is of type `str`, we still
need to make sure the validator passes gracefully, so that the inbuilt
type check can be the bit that catches if someone passes in a non-str
value. We've seen this with people passing in integers instead of strs
for phone numbers. This'll make them receive a nice 400 error
(e.g. "phone_number 12345 is not of type string"), rather than us
having a 500 internal server error
We now have a new column in the database, but it isn't being
populated. The first step is to make sure we update this column,
while still keeping the old enum based column up to date as well.
A couple of changes have had to happen to support this - one irritating
thing is that if we're ever querying columns individually, including
`Notification.status`, then we'll need to give that column a label,
since under the hood it translates to `Notification._status_enum`.
Accessing status through the ORM (i.e., my_noti.status = 'sending' or
similar) will work fine.
The is_between_end_date_exclusive is a bit funny.
Perhaps the better way to handle it is to make the function is_between but change the financial year function return an enddate that is one millisecond less. That way we can always use the between logic and it will be easier to use.
"sent" is fine as an internal marker but not very obvious to the end
user that it specifically refers to international messages. We now
say "Sent internationally" in the CSV
Since the response has changed I have created new endpoints so that the deployments for Admin are more managable.
Removed print statements from some tests.
Once we have the new columns in notifications table, the query will need to include the rate multiplier and if the number is international.
The monthly billing query will be built next.
* We currently don't validate the number so this test
* will fail assuming an invalid number was passed.
* Since we do validation on the front end, for now
* we'll assume a valid number. This does need to be
* looked at in future.
