brings in a fix to InvalidEmail/Phone/AddressExceptions not being
instantiated correctly. `exception.message` is not a python standard,
so we shouldn't be relying on it to transmit exception reasons -
rather we should be using `str(exception)` instead. This involved a
handful of small changes to the schema validation
cloudfront caching isn't set up on those environments yet, so continue
to use flask for now - in the future we'll want to revert this once
those environments are up and running properly
When the start_date and end_date query argruments exists in the request,
the query will return the results from the NotificationHistory table for the given date range.
We will need to check the performance of this query, but this will only be used by the platform admin page.
it now switches utils.template.Template type, since the base Template
type now no longer has a subject attribute.
updated test case to use `sample_email_template_with_placeholders`
instead of `sample_email_template`
branding in emails was previously hosted from admin app - this changes
the url to be static.{domain}/images instead of {domain}/static/images,
which redirects to cloudfront.
some manipulation of the URL was required to make sure it still serves
locally rather than returning "static.localhost:6012" for example.
(if ADMIN_BASE_URL is localhost it just returns the old /static/
path)
also was able to remove DB interaction from a test. woo!
The reason for doing this is to ensure the tasks performed for the Notify users are not queued behind a large job, a way to
ensure priority for messages.
6th task for story: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/135839709
The reason for doing this is to ensure the tasks performed for the Notify users are not queued behind a large job, a way to
ensure priority for messages.
5th task for story: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/135839709
The reason for doing this is to ensure the tasks performed for the Notify users are not queued behind a large job, a way to
ensure priority for messages.
4th task for story: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/135839709
the provider details tests were previously very stateful - they
would update a value, and then because provider_details is a "static"
table that is not wiped by the notify_db_session fixture, the tests
were forced to make a second update that reverted that change. if the
test fails for whatever reason, the provider_details table ends up
permanently modified, playing havoc on tests further down the line.
this commit adds the fixture `restore_provider_details` to conftest.
this fixture stores a copy of the contents of ProviderDetails and
ProviderDetailsHistory tables outside of the session, runs the test,
and then clears the table and puts those old values in
this means that the tests have been cleaned up so that they do not
do operations twice in reverse. they've also been cleaned up
generally, including fixture optimisations and such
the first argument to ANY logger.____ function is ALWAYS cast to a
string and used as a format argument for ALL remaining arguments
using %s formatting. even `logger.exception`, which just logs as
normal and then appends the stack trace.
so we shouldn't be passing `e` into logger.exception - just
`logger.exception('something went wrong!')`
also de-duplicated a test
- note this is an unexpectedly big change.
- When we create a service we pass the service id to the persist method. This means that we don't have the service available to check if in research mode.
- All calling methods (expecting the one where we use the notify service) have the service available. So rather than reload it I changed the method signature to pass the service, not the ID to persist.
- Touches a few places.
Note this means that the update or create methods will fall over on a null service. But this seems correct.
Goes back to the story which we need to play to make the service available as the API user so that the need to load and pass around services is minimised.
The reason for doing this is to ensure the tasks performed for the Notify users are not queued behind a large job, a way to
ensure priority for messages.
The reason for doing this is to ensure the tasks performed for the Notify users are not queued behind a large job, a way to
ensure priority for messages.
- Problem was that on notification creation we pass the template ID not the template onto the new notification object
- We then set the history object from this notification object by copying all the fields. This is OK at this point.
- We then set the relationship on the history object based on the template, which we haven't passed in. We only passed the ID. This means that SQLAlchemy nulls the relationship, removing the template_id.
- Later we update the history row when we send the message, this fixes the data. BUT if we ever have a send error, then this never happens and the template is never set on the history table.
Fix:
Set only the template ID when creating the history object.
* Ensure we dont raise exception if e.cause does not contain a message
* Ensure we handle case where e.path may be empty
* Refactor existing tests to conform to new format
This makes this test a couple of seconds faster - 0.7s instead of 2.5s for me
locally. sample_notification also creates a service, template, user and
permissions, but we don't need any of these objects to exist in the database
for this test. It's particularly helpful for this test because there are so
many parameterized cases. Thanks @leohemsted for suggesting doing this here.
