This deletes a big ol' chunk of code related to letters. It's not everything—there are still a few things that might be tied to sms/email—but it's the the heart of letters function. SMS and email function should be untouched by this.
Areas affected:
- Things obviously about letters
- PDF tasks, used for precompiling letters
- Virus scanning, used for those PDFs
- FTP, used to send letters to the printer
- Postage stuff
When we cloned the repository and started making modifications, we
didn't initially keep tests in step. This commit tries to get us to a
clean test run by skipping tests that are failing and removing some
that we no longer expect to use (MMG, Firetext), with the intention that
we will come back in future and update or remove them as appropriate.
To find all tests skipped, search for `@pytest.mark.skip(reason="Needs
updating for TTS:`. There will be a brief description of the work that
needs to be done to get them passing, if known. Delete that line to make
them run in a standard test run (`make test`).
* notify_db fixture creates the database connection and ensures the test
db exists and has migrations applied etc. It will run once per session
(test run).
* notify_db_session fixture runs after your test finishes and deletes
all non static (eg type table) data.
In unit tests that hit the database (ie: most of them), 99% of the time
we will need to use notify_db_session to ensure everything is reset. The
only time we don't need to use it is when we're querying things such as
"ensure get X works when database is empty". This is such a low
percentage of tests that it's easier for us to just use
notify_db_session every time, and ensure that all our tests run much
more consistently, at the cost of a small bit of performance when
running tests.
We used to use notify_db to access the session object for manually
adding, committing, etc. To dissuade usage of that fixture I've moved
that to the `notify_db_session`. I've then removed all uses of notify_db
that I could find in the codebase.
As a note, if you're writing a test that uses a `sample_x` fixture, all
of those fixtures rely on notify_db_session so you'll get the teardown
functionality for free. If you're just calling eg `create_x` db.py
functions, then you'll need to make you add notify_db_session fixture to
your test, even if you aren't manually accessing the session.
this was added five years ago but never used. if we want to bring back
variable rates per client we might as well get a fresh start since a lot
has changed since then.
These were only there to ensure a DB session existed for the test
and are now included implicitly as one of the dependencies of the
"sample_user" fixture.
This switches a number of fixtures to use "sample_user", which is
equivalent to calling the previous "create_user" function when it
used to default the email to "notify@...".
This means we can use it in the next commit. Also, it was surprising
for the function to be returning a tuple of values, instead of just
the service object. Since the consumers of the function only needed
the user as auditing data, it's fine to use the first team member.
We want to start using Firetext for sending international SMS. They
require us to use a different API key for international SMS because it
requires a new code path to switch the sender ID to something that the
country will accept.
This PR does not include switching the sender of international SMS to
Firetext but sets us up to do so.
We've decided we don't get any value from these emails any more, so this
stops us (Notify support) receiving them. We still let teams know an MOU
has been signed.
We will use this to easily identify all our broadcast services. There
could be other ways to deal with finding and seeing all broadcast
services but this is a good and easy way to start.
We think it would be a security risk to show the name of services
involved in emergency alerts as they be responsible for things such as
counter terrorism.
On top of that, showing broadcast services in the list of all services
could enable someone to use that information to try and trick an admin
into letting them access of a particular service given the fact they
know the name of it
This will make our `sample_broadcast_service` look more realistic.
The one downside to this, is that there will be a short amount of time
where we have broadcast services that do not have a row in the
service_broadcast_settings table until we have backfilled this data. Our
unit tests therefore won't have coverage for this case but I think the
risk is small and acceptable for the moment as this will no longer be
the case in say a weeks time.
