I find it really difficult to visually parse test files unless we
have a consistent convention for how we name our test functions.
In most of our tests the name of the test function starts with the
name of the function under test.
Previously we sent them emails about this manually. We also tried
a Zendesk macro/trigger approach, but using a CC means:
- We can control the behaviour ourselves (Zendesk triggers can only
be edited by admins outside our team).
- We keep the DVLA notification approach consistent and in one place,
so notifications always go to the same people.
- Any further (public) updates to the ticket will also trigger a
notification to DVLA (previous trigger only notified on creation).
include a link to a runbook entry.
also the list of acknowledgement files can be very long, so make that
the last thing, and use new lines to space out the message.
We no longer will send them any stats so therefore don't need the code
- the code to work out the nightly stats
- the performance platform client
- any configuration for the client
- any nightly tasks that kick off the sending off the stats
We will require a change in cronitor as we no longer will have this task
run meaning we need to delete the cronitor check.
We current do this as part of send-daily-performance-platform-stats but
now this moves it into its own separate task. This is for two reasons
- we will shortly get rid of the send-daily-performance-platform-stats
task as we no longer will need to send anything to performance
platform
- even if we did decide to keep the task
send-daily-performance-platform-stats and remove the specific bits
that relate to the performance platform, it's probably nicer to
rewrite the new task from scratch to make sure it's all clear and easy
to understand
In 8285ef5f89
we turned off alerting on 2nd class letters still being in sending on
certain days of the week because we were only sending letters out on
Mon, Wed, Fri.
Now we have swapped back to sending out 2nd class letters on all
workdays so this change can be reverted. Note, I haven't reverted the
commit exactly but more so the behaviour, whilst leaving in some tests
to explicitly test 2nd class letters for the alert in case we change
this again.
Move finding of letter logic into a separate method so it can be unit
tested rather than having to test it by checking the contents of a
zendesk ticket api call.
This will enable us to change the zendesk api ticket call message
without needing to edit lots of tests.
Code that is within a `with Python.raises(...)` context manager but
comes after the line that raises the exception doesn't get evaluated.
We had some assertions that we never being tested because of this, so
this ensures that they will always get run and fixes them where
necessary.
- Change the NotificationTechnicalFailureException so that it only inherits from Exception.
- The notify_celery task should create the logging message on failure.
- Fix unit tests
- Remove named parameter when raising exception.
re-order notification dao delete notifications test to move "fixtures"
to the top of the file
changed create_service_data_retention to take an ORM object, not an id.
brings it in line with other db.py test functions
When we send a zip file of letters to DVLA we expect them to send back an acknowledgement of those files.
Previously they named the files like NOTIFY.20180202091254.ACK.TXT and the contents would contain the name of the zip file we sent with a date of when they got it.
They have updated this format to mirror the format of the zip file because there was an instance where they sent 2 files of the same name so the later overwrote the first.
Since the name matches our name, there is no need to get the file from S3 but just compare file names.
* call variables unambiguous things like `start_time` or `bst_date` to
reduce risk of passing in the wrong thing
* simplify the count_dict object - remove nested dict and start_date
fields as superfluous
* use static datetime objects in tests rather than calculating them
each time
Changed the query to get the performance platform stats from ft_notification_status. But the date used for the query needed to be a date, not datetime so the equality worked.
The previous query was including all notifications regardless of notification_status. I don't think that's right, it shouldn't include things like technical-failure or validation-failed. Thoughts?
I also need to remove the query that's no longer being used.
