we add a row in AnnualBilling table whenever a new service is created,
and our billing code assumes this is done. Yet when we were writing
some of the tests, this was not a thing yet, so now we are updating
those tests so they reflect our system well.
Co-authored-by: Pea Tyczynska <pea.tyczynska@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk>
The big breaking change for our code (not mentioned in the changelog) is
that the built-in validator for the `date-time` format now requires the
`rfc3339-validator` package instead of the `strict-rfc3339` package.
This updates the requirements file to use `rfc3339-validator`. Without
this change, wrong `date-time` formats would always silently pass validation.
Daily volumes report: total volumes across the platform aggregated by whole business day (bst_date)
Volumes by service report: total volumes per service aggregated by the date range given.
NB: start and end dates are inclusive
This field caused some confusion and lots of unnecessary work
to our colleague because of unclear name.
The field was named sms_fragments, where in fact the value of
the field is: those sms fragments that go above free allowance
multiplied by the rate multiplier.
The new name was chosen through consultation with colleagues
who use billing report the most.
This adds total_letters to the data that is returned by the
`/platform-stats/data-for-billing-report` endpoint so that we can add
total letters as a column in the CSV file that can be downloaded.
Names of services and orgs were confusing, and variable setting
was done in a way that made it easy to introduce errors.
Now hopefully it is more readable and more error-proof.
Usage for all services is a platform admin report that groups letters by
postage. We want it to show `europe` and `rest-of-world` letters under a
single category of `international`, so this updates the query to do
that and to order appropriately.
This endpoint may need to change, but we'd like to see how this performs, so we'll test this with a real data set. Then come back to make sure the format is correct and check for missing tests for the endpoint,
Code that is within a `with Python.raises(...)` context manager but
comes after the line that raises the exception doesn't get evaluated.
We had some assertions that we never being tested because of this, so
this ensures that they will always get run and fixes them where
necessary.
Created a platform-stats blueprint and moved the new platform stats
endpoint to the new blueprint (it was previously in the service
blueprint). Since the original platform stats route and the new platform
stats route are now in different blueprints, their view functions can
have the same name without any issues.
