This changeset pulls in all of the notification_utils code directly into the API and removes it as an external dependency. We are doing this to cut down on operational maintenance of the project and will begin removing parts of it no longer needed for the API.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Costino <carlo.costino@gsa.gov>
This deletes a big ol' chunk of code related to letters. It's not everything—there are still a few things that might be tied to sms/email—but it's the the heart of letters function. SMS and email function should be untouched by this.
Areas affected:
- Things obviously about letters
- PDF tasks, used for precompiling letters
- Virus scanning, used for those PDFs
- FTP, used to send letters to the printer
- Postage stuff
We were using the Draft4Validator in one place, so this updates it to
the Draft7Validator instead.
The schemas were mostly using draft 4 of the JSON schema, though there
were a couple of schemas that were already of version 7. This updates
them all to version 7, which is the latest version fully supported by
the jsonschema Python package. There are some breaking changes in the
newer version of the schema, but I could not see anywhere would these
affect us. Some of these schemas were not valid in version 4, but are
now valid in version 7 because `"required": []` was not valid in earlier
versions.
This caught me out the other day when I was testing. I thought antivirus
was enable, seeing this message didn't help with that assumption. Plus
there is no point in showing the log if we don't actually call the task.
It is possible that the personalisation for a templated letter can make the letter exceed 10 pages or 5 sheets. We are not validating the letters posted via the API for this validation error. It is only possible to validate the letter once we create the PDF in notifications-template-preview. This means that the letter can only get a validation-failed status after the client has received a 201 from the POST to /v2/notifications.
NOTE: we only validate the preview row of a CSV for this validation error, this change will mean that it is possible for a letter to be marked as validation-failed after a successful file upload.
A new task to update the notification to `validation-failed` has been added to the API. If we find that the letter is too long once we have created the PDF we call the `update-validation-failed-for-templated-letter` task rather than `update-billable-units-for-letter` task.
New work flow for a letter in brief:
API - receives POST /v2/notifications
:: save to db
:: put CREATE_LETTERS_PDF task on queue for template preview to consume
TEMPLATE-PREVIEW - consumes task CREATE_LETTERS_PDF
:: create PDF
:: count pages of PDF
:: IF page count exceeds 10 pages
put in the letters-invalid-pdf S3 bucket with metadata (similar to the precompiled letters)
put `update-validation-failed-for-templated-letter` task on the queue for the API to consume
ELSE
put PDF in the `letters-pdf` bucket
put `update-billable-units-for-letter` task on the queue
API - consumes `update-billable-units-for-letter` OR `update-validation-failed-for-templated-letter` task
:: IF `update-billable-units-for-letter` task:
update billable units for notification as usual
:: ELSE `update-validation-failed-for-templated-letter`:
update notification_status = `validation-failed`
ADMIN - view notification page for letter
:: show validation letter for templated letter
There will be 3 PRs in order to make this change, one for the API, template-preview and the admin app.
Deployment plan
Deploy Admin first
Deploy API
Deploy template-preview
Related PRs:
alphagov/notifications-template-preview#619alphagov/notifications-admin#4107https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/169209742
This is a similar PR to https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-api/pull/2284.
When using flask-sqlalchemy to get a `Pagination` object, by default
it will run two queries
1. Get the page of results that you are asking for
2. If the number of results is equal to the page size, then it will
issue a second query that will count the total number of results
Getting the total number of results is only useful if
- you need to show how many results there are
- you need to know if there is a next page of results (flask-sqlalchemy
uses the total to work out how many pages there are altogether,
which may not be the most efficient way of working out if there
is a next page or not but that is what it currently does).
Looking at the `get_notifications` route, it does
not use `paginated_notifications.total` or
`paginated_notifications.has_next` and therefore we have no use
for the second query to get the total number of results.
We can stop this additional query by setting `count_pages=False`
which will hopefully give us some performance improvements, in
particular for services which send a lot of notifications.
Flask sqlalchemy references:
https://github.com/pallets/flask-sqlalchemy/blob/818c947b665206fe8edd8c1680b18ce83d3e4744/src/flask_sqlalchemy/__init__.py#L478https://github.com/pallets/flask-sqlalchemy/blob/818c947b665206fe8edd8c1680b18ce83d3e4744/src/flask_sqlalchemy/__init__.py#L399
Note, I have checked the other uses of `get_notifications_for_service`
and the other cases are currently using the total or next page so
this approach is not something we can take with them.
Previously we were catching one type of exception if something went
wrong adding a notification to the queue for high volume services.
In reality there are two types of exception so this adds a second
handler to cover both.
For context, this is code we changed experimentally as part of the
upgrade to Celery 5 [1]. At the time we didn't check how the new
exception compared to the old one. It turns out they behaved the
same and we were always vulnerable to the scenario now covered by
the second exception, where the behaviour has changed in Celery 5 -
testing with a large task invocation gives...
Before (Celery 3, large-ish task):
'process_job.apply_async(["a" * 200000])'...
boto.exception.SQSError: SQSError: 400 Bad Request
<?xml version="1.0"?><ErrorResponse xmlns="http://queue.amazonaws.com/doc/2012-11-05/"><Error><Type>Sender</Type><Code>InvalidParameterValue</Code><Message>One or more parameters are invalid. Reason: Message must be shorter than 262144 bytes.</Message><Detail/></Error><RequestId>96162552-cd96-5a14-b3a5-7f503300a662</RequestId></ErrorResponse>
Before (Celery 3, very large task):
<hangs forever>
After (Celery 5, large-ish task):
botocore.exceptions.ClientError: An error occurred (InvalidParameterValue) when calling the SendMessage operation: One or more parameters are invalid. Reason: Message must be shorter than 262144 bytes.
After (Celery 5, very large task):
botocore.parsers.ResponseParserError: Unable to parse response (syntax error: line 1, column 0), invalid XML received. Further retries may succeed:
b'HTTP content length exceeded 1662976 bytes.'
[1]: https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-api/pull/3355/commits/29c92a9e54fe406f9490f6c89bd047832f75ab5f
Just looks a bit tidier and less repetitive.
I’ve only done this for the serialised service because:
- we’re only checking this in places where we’re already using the
serialised service
- if we want to check this elsewhere there’s a good chance that new code
should be using the serialised service, since it’ll itself be doing
some kind of performance optimisation
We haven't bumped the test version for a while.
Also bumped the version of Flask and itsdangerous.
In order to fix flask warnings I needed to changed how the blueprints were registerd.
Add different error message for email and text if content is too long.
Use utils version with is_message_too_long method implemented for email templates.
We want to add validation for an email that's too long, that way the user knows why the message is failing. At the moment if an email is too long it will get a technical failure, after the retries fail. This way the email post will get a validation error.
Once this: https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-utils/pull/804 is reverted, we can update the utils version.
This code is already restricted to SMS and email, so this is only to make it obvious if there is a code refactor down the line. Perhaps this is overkill and we back out this commit.
Kenneth Kehl