darkhelm/notifications-api
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/GSA/notifications-api.git synced 2026-01-30 06:21:50 -05:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

remove day_start from create nightly notification status

Browse Source 
it makes less sense once we introduce different start dates for letters
and emails. Also, we never use it, since we just call the day tasks
ourselves from commands.py
This commit is contained in:
Leo Hemsted
2019-12-05 15:59:40 +00:00
parent 2019070536
commit 884cb24bfa
2 changed files with 9 additions and 15 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
tests/app/celery/test_reporting_tasks.py
View File

@@ -50,16 +50,15 @@ def test_create_nightly_billing_triggers_tasks_for_days(notify_api, mocker, day_
@freeze_time('2019-08-01')
@pytest.mark.parametrize('day_start, expected_kwargs', [
(None, ['2019-07-31', '2019-07-30', '2019-07-29', '2019-07-28']),
('2019-07-21', ['2019-07-21', '2019-07-20', '2019-07-19', '2019-07-18']),
])
def test_create_nightly_notification_status_triggers_tasks_for_days(notify_api, mocker, day_start, expected_kwargs):
def test_create_nightly_notification_status_triggers_tasks_for_days(notify_api, mocker):
mock_celery = mocker.patch('app.celery.reporting_tasks.create_nightly_notification_status_for_day')
create_nightly_notification_status(day_start)
create_nightly_notification_status()
assert mock_celery.apply_async.call_count == 4 * 3 # four days, three notification types
for process_date, notification_type in itertools.product(expected_kwargs, ['sms', 'email', 'letter']):
for process_date, notification_type in itertools.product(
['2019-07-31', '2019-07-30', '2019-07-29', '2019-07-28'],
['sms', 'email', 'letter']
):
mock_celery.apply_async.assert_any_call(
kwargs={'process_day': process_date, 'notification_type': notification_type},
queue=QueueNames.REPORTING