Update to test as per review comments.

However, I am curious if there is evidence that using fake_uuid over creating one in the test is actually faster.
This commit is contained in:
Rebecca Law
2016-04-29 14:36:10 +01:00
parent 8c14b5a8ab
commit 11c4696775
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ def process_job(job_id):
if template.template_type == 'sms': if template.template_type == 'sms':
send_sms.apply_async(( send_sms.apply_async((
str(job.service_id), str(job.service_id),
str(create_uuid()), create_uuid(),
encrypted, encrypted,
datetime.utcnow().strftime(DATETIME_FORMAT)), datetime.utcnow().strftime(DATETIME_FORMAT)),
queue='bulk-sms' queue='bulk-sms'
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ def process_job(job_id):
if template.template_type == 'email': if template.template_type == 'email':
send_email.apply_async(( send_email.apply_async((
str(job.service_id), str(job.service_id),
str(create_uuid()), create_uuid(),
'"{}" <{}@{}>'.format( '"{}" <{}@{}>'.format(
service.name, service.name,
service.email_from, service.email_from,

View File

@@ -276,14 +276,14 @@ def test_authentication_returns_error_when_api_client_has_no_secrets(notify_api,
def test_authentication_returns_error_when_service_has_no_secrets(notify_api, def test_authentication_returns_error_when_service_has_no_secrets(notify_api,
notify_db, notify_db,
notify_db_session, notify_db_session,
sample_service): sample_service,
fake_uuid):
with notify_api.test_request_context(): with notify_api.test_request_context():
with notify_api.test_client() as client: with notify_api.test_client() as client:
import uuid
token = create_jwt_token( token = create_jwt_token(
request_method="GET", request_method="GET",
request_path='/service', request_path='/service',
secret=str(uuid.uuid4()), secret=fake_uuid,
client_id=str(sample_service.id)) client_id=str(sample_service.id))
response = client.get( response = client.get(