mirror of
https://github.com/GSA/notifications-admin.git
synced 2026-08-24 16:24:08 -04:00
7413423243
We're reusing the logic for the `move_to` nested radios field for the user folder permissions nested checkboxes. The main difference between the two forms (aside from the different input type) is that "Move" form contains the root "Templates" as an option, whereas the folder permissions doesn't. It turns out that, because of the way NestedFieldMixin.children and select_nested macro are implemented the easiest way to get the desired folder permissions behaviour is to add the root folder as a choice with a `None` value and `NONE_OPTION_VALUE = None` set on the field, which allows the `child_map` to be constructed but doesn't display the root folder checkbox itself since it gets overwritten in the final `child_map`.
32 lines
944 B
HTML
32 lines
944 B
HTML
{% from "components/checkbox.html" import checkbox, checkboxes_nested %}
|
||
{% from "components/radios.html" import radio, radios, conditional_radio_panel %}
|
||
|
||
<fieldset class="form-group">
|
||
<legend class="form-label">
|
||
Permissions
|
||
</legend>
|
||
{% for field in form.permissions_fields %}
|
||
{{ checkbox(field) }}
|
||
{% endfor %}
|
||
</fieldset>
|
||
|
||
<p class="bottom-gutter">
|
||
All team members can see sent messages.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
{% if current_service.has_permission("edit_folder_permissions") %}
|
||
{{ checkboxes_nested(form.folder_permissions, form.folder_permissions.children()) }}
|
||
{% endif %}
|
||
|
||
{% if service_has_email_auth %}
|
||
{% if not mobile_number %}
|
||
{{ radios(
|
||
form.login_authentication,
|
||
disable=['sms_auth'],
|
||
option_hints={'sms_auth': 'Not available because this team member hasn’t added a phone number to their profile'|safe}
|
||
) }}
|
||
{% else %}
|
||
{{ radios(form.login_authentication) }}
|
||
{% endif %}
|
||
{% endif %}
|