This was causing a 500 in production.
This commit:
- reverts the code the working state it was before 68a1426e58
- figures out a way to make the tests pass without breaking the actual
app
- confirms that mocking things is hard
Because we’re setting the API key and service ID after calling the
`__init__` method of the client it wasn’t doing the thing where it
splits the combined key into the two individual UUIDs. So we still need
to set them directly, individually on the client.
There’s some weird interaction between the message attribute of the
exception and mocking.
Luckily there is an internal attribute – `_message` which doesn’t go
through all the magic.
The Notify API client changed in version 4 to take two arguments, not
three (service ID was removed in favour of the combined API key).
This gets a bit gnarly because the API key has to be at least a certain
length so it can be substringed internally.
When I split up the error messages on the check CSV page into multiple
templates, I also reduced the repetition of wrapping `<div>`s and macro
calls by moving them up outside the conditional blocks (see
8e947f315d).
Unfortunately I didn’t make the same adjustments for the one-off flow,
which meant that errors on these pages lost their styling. This commit
re-adds the styling for these error messages.
Google analytics lets you send:
- pageviews
- events
Page views are used by default. But sometimes you wanna count something
which isn’t the user navigating to a new page, or you wanna track
something which isn’t just what page they were looking it. This is where
events are useful.
This commit adds a small JS module that lets us fire off an event when
the presence of an element with the right data attributes are present on
the page.
The reason to indent the first column heading is so that the number 1
lines up with the numbers of subsequent rows.
This only happens when the subsequent rows are indented because of the
red bars. This is only when there are row errors, not when there are
more general errors.
There was a lot of repetetive wrapping code being repeated for every
conditional block in these files. Let’s wrap it around the whole
conditional bit once instead.
If you have errors in your file then there’s stuff you’re not going to
see on the page. So this doesn’t need to be in the Jinja templates that
are only used when there are errors.
Basically the conditional stuff is moving up to the level above these
templates.
Adds a new endpoint that works like view template/view preview of
letter, so that this page works the same way it does for emails/text
messages (ie showing the full content of the message, including
personalisation).
We’re not worrying about redaction in letters for now.
The status won’t ever change from sending for letters. For now at least.
And even when we do come up with more useful statuses I’m not convinced
it’s useful to expose them to our admin users.
A more useful piece of information to show is when we think the letter
will be delivered.
There’s no immediate feedback with letter jobs, unlike email or text
messages jobs where you see the numbers starting to tick over straight
away.
We need to reassure the user that the thing they asked us to do (send
letters) is underway. ‘Printing’ feels like the natural first state of
the letter-making process. So this commit adds a banner to tell the
user that printing is the thing that’s happening.
The sending/failed/delivered thing:
- doesn’t map to the actual states of letters
- doesn’t respond quickly enough to give you feedback that something is
happening (because "sending" doesn’t even go to "probably delivered"
for a few days)
This commit replaces these 4 boxes with some more useful information:
- one number – how many letters were in the job in total
- when we estimate that the letters will be delivered
The status for each letter in a job will be the same for every single
letter (at least until we start dealing with returns).
It’s redundant to show this information over and over again. This commit
removes it.
The idea is if you decide your problem isn’t such an emergency after
all, we direct you to the form where you can report it as such. This
link wasn’t working because it didn’t understand `False` to mean ‘not
severe’. Only ‘no’ means not severe.
The result was that users got sent in a bit of a convoluted loop
where they were asked again if their problem was an emergency or not.
Testing this by making sure that both:
- the URL in the link is what we expected
- when visited it gives the page title we expect
Because even if we had had the first test only, it wouldn’t have caught
this bug.
It will also be useful to know (especially for the API):
- when a letter was printed
- if it’s been printed or not
This commit:
- adds code to calculate these two pieces of information
- refactors the function to return a `namedtuple` – a tuple of two items
was manageable, but with four items it was getting hard to know what
each one meant – this lets us label each piece of information that is
being returned
