- Deleted /stylesheets folder
- Removed sass build from gulpfile
- Changed gov links to usa links
- Changed other govuk styles, like breadcrumbs
- Changed name of uk_components file to us_components
- Fixed a few tests that broke on account of the changes
* Updated header and footer
* Moved files around and updated gulpfile to correct the build process when it goes to production
* Updated fonts
* Adjusted grid templating
* Adding images to assets
* Updated account pages, dashboard, and pages in message sending flow
* Updated the styling for the landing pages in the account section once logged in
We feel that this is more appropriate because it’s part of the
information you’re agreeing to before you hit submit.
Sometimes users can missing information that doesn’t start left-aligned
to the column they’re interacting with.
It also makes it closer to the Design System component.
We’re keeping it in the sticky footer, so that it’s always visible no
matter where in the message you’re scrolled to (this means you won’t
have to edited to content then scroll down to check whether you’ve
made it fit).
Includes:
- turning off :visited styles to match existing
design
- swapping heading classes used to make links bold
for the GOVUK Frontend bold override class
- adding visually hidden text to some links to
make them work when isolated from their context
We may need to revisit whether some links, such as
those for documentation and features, may benefit
from having some indication that their target has
been visited.
Includes:
- turning off :visited styles to match existing
design
- swapping heading classes used to make links bold
for the GOVUK Frontend bold override class
- adding visually hidden text to some links to
make them work when isolated from their context
We may need to revisit whether some links, such as
those for documentation and features, may benefit
from having some indication that their target has
been visited.
HighlightTags was bad because:
- we haven’t called placeholders ‘tags’ for a long time
- it also does resizing of the `<textarea>`, not just highlighting the
placeholders
Scrolling within textareas on the page is a bit grim. Which is why we
don’t do it for the textboxes that people use to edit templates.
This commit will allow us to extend the auto-resizing of `<textarea>`s
to those which don’t need the highlighting of placeholders.
The code is still quite coupled to the placeholder highlighting code,
because both work by copying the content of the `<textarea>` into a
`<div>` that underlaps the textbox. This `<div>` is used for both
rendering the placeholder highlights, and calculating the natural height
of the content. So it would be hard/confusing to split the two bits of
code into separate modules.
This commit improves the code that previews a hex colour when setting up
or changing an email branding.
Specifically it:
- refactors the Javascript to conform to our patterns (module pattern,
preprocessed with Gulp)
- makes the code work when there are multiple colour previews on one
page
It also does some visual prettifying, because I couldn’t help myself…
We started tracking upload errors in eb264f34b7
This has been useful.
This commit adds tracking of other form validation errors, so we can
pick up if there’s a form field that’s causing people particular
trouble.
Also had to rewrite a very old test to look for page content in a
smarter way.
no actual template functionality yet - just the ability for services
that have letters enabled to edit a 10 line block that will go on the
top right hand side of their letters with contact information
It’s invalid HTML to have multiple labels nested within each other. This
was happening by accident because WTForms tries to be clever – when you
put `{{ field.label }}` in a template it prints a `<label>` tag for you,
not just the text of the label. But we put our own `<label>` tags in the
HTML to have more control of them.
This commit stops WTForms being so clever.
This commit:
- moves things around a bit on the request to go live page
- sticks a textbox in there
So when someone click the big green button, we will get a support ticket
that looks something like:
```
From Test User <test@user.gov.uk> on behalf of Test Service
(6ce466d0-fd6a-11e5-82f5-e0accb9d11a6)
---
We’ll send about 1000 text messages in the first month, and then 10,000
text messages per month after that. Usage of our service is about 50%
higher in March, at the end of the tax year.
```
I think this was used for the invite page at one point, but isn’t now.
Generally at GDS we don’t do disabled form controls, they don’t tell you
_why_ they’re disabled.
This commit adds a new page, which appears after a user enters the name for
their new service. It shows how the service name will appear in emails and
text messages.
This means that the new service is not created until after they have confirmed
that the name is appropriate in context.
This has also involved:
- visual changes to the ‘email template’ pattern, which wasn’t very refined
before
- removing a bunch of words from the enter service name page, because most users
don’t read them, and we reckon that showing a preview is a better way of
getting them to understand what is meant by service name
Still to do:
- validating the the generated email address for a service is unique (on the
API) side
- having the API return the generated email address, rather than determining it
in the admin app
This commit adds a very small Javascript module to autofocus a textbox on page
load. It should only be used once per page.
It also adds a parameter to the textbox macro which adds the attribute to
trigger autofocus.
For entering 2 or 3fa codes, we want a textbox that’s just over 6 characters
wide.
To do this, a width can now be passed to the textbox macro. The possible widths
are the same as those provided by GOV.UK Elements, and in the same format (eg
1-4, 1-2, 2-3…)
This commit also adds a new width (5em) which is suitable for 3fa codes, and
adds it to the verify page.
The grouping on this page was weird because these links were two far away from
the associated textbox, and too close to the next textbox.
This commit adds them as parameters to the textbox macro, which means their
relative spacing can be controlled exactly, and thus reduced.
This macro:
- accepts a WTForm form field as a parameter
- renders a form field which follows the GOV.UK Elements patterns, both visually
and in markup terms
It then changes any page which uses either:
- the old, non-WTForms macro or
- the old, WTFforms `render_field` macro
…to use this new macro and removes both of the old ones.
It also adds the option to display hint text above the textbox.
For pages where
- we want you to be sure that you want to do what you’re about to do
- we want to be sure it’s you trying to do the thing
This adds a page that asks the user to confirm their password.
Users can add placeholders to their messages, eg
> …your vehicle ((registration number))
when the message is sent, this gets replaced with the data the user uploads, eg
> …your vehicle LC12 BFL
We reckon that it will be useful to see that the placeholder has been
recognised, ie that its syntax is correct, before uploading any data.
We reckon that the best way to do this is by styling it differently to the rest
of the text that the user types.
This is not a trivial problem. There are two possible ways to do it:
1 Write a Google Docs-style text rendering engine, which completely replaces
the native HTML `<textarea>` with a custom control, and programme what should
happen when the user types something that looks like a placeholder, or
presses an arrow key, or makes a selection, or…
2 Leave the `<textarea>` in place, unmodified, and duplicate layers in front
of/behind it to visually replace a placeholder with the blue lozenge
Unsurprisingly, this commit implements 2.
There are four layers. Each layer contains live-updated copy of the text in the
textbox, and each is styled differently:
- one layer behind the textbox to make the blue background
- the textbox itself
- a layer with the white text, which overlays the black text of the textbox
- a layer with an inner shadow to knock back the brackets
This is because of some interesting limitations:
- The text in the foreground and background must occupy the same physical space,
so no deleting characters from the duplicated layers
- Words can’t be split up into multiple elements,
eg `<span>((</span>regist…`:—this results in slightly different kerning to
`((regis…`, which messes up the alignment of the layers
- The textbox can’t be completely overlapped with a block of colour, because
the cursor disappears behind it. Trying to edit text when you can’t see the
cursor is hard.
Implementation
Technically this makes use of Paul Hayes work on Javascript modules in the
GOV.UK frontend toolkit[1].
It also makes use of the `oninput` event to detect changes to the textbox’s
contents. This is much more performant than `onkeydown`, `onpaste`, etc. Without
it the delay between user input and the layers all updating is too slow and you
see misalignment of the layers.
1. https://github.com/alphagov/govuk_frontend_toolkit/pull/227
