When viewing a letter template, there is a button to edit the letter
contact block. This should take the user to the page to edit the letter
contact block, but if a service has not set any letter contact blocks, the
button was returning a 404 error.
The code has now been changed so that if the service has no letter contact
blocks the edit button will link to the page to add a letter contact
block.
Pivotal story: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/152881444
Email auth is a new feature that currently we’ve only given to teams
who have contact us with a problem.
At the moment, we’re aware of all the teams that are sharing phone
numbers when they sign in. We think that in the future there will be
other teams who encounter this problem. So we should let them know that
they should contact us if they are having the problem.
At the moment we want to talk to teams before giving them access to the
feature, so that we’re confident it’s only going to teams from whom it’s
more secure than using a text message code.
We’re extracting this from being determined based on what the sender
name is to its own setting.
This commit will let users set it independently.
Until the explicitly set it, it will still be determined based on
whether their default sender name matches the default for the platform.
Linebreaks are an important part of the letter contact block, and make
it easier to read.
Bold text works for short pieces of info like email addresses or phone
numbers, but is too heavy for the letter contact blocks because they
tend to be longer.
Most user will only have one reply to address. Which means they should
never have to worry about IDs. And if you only have one then you never
need its ID, because the last remaining address will always be the
default.
So IDs should only be shown when a service has created more than one
reply to address.
This required a bit of visual tweaking of the _user list_ pattern,
because its spacing wasn’t defined in a way that worked when only the
name of the thing, and not its details were shown on the page.
The first users of multiple email reply to addresses will be using the
API. This means that the need to be able to specify the ID of the reply
to address they want.
We chose to implement it like this instead of by passing the address in
directly because that means deploying code. For some teams deploying
code can take weeks, and we’d like to let teams have the flexibility to
make changes faster than this.
Same as for templates, you shouldn’t have to go to the _edit_ page in
order to get the ID. This means listing them on the page where you see
all the reply to addresses.
Listing the IDs like this means that it’s not really a table any more,
because the information isn’t organised in columns. So I think it makes
sense to reuse the pattern from the manage team page, which has a
similar relationship between the information.
It’s not either text messages, or emails, or both now – it’s any
combination of the three channels.
This commit adds ‘letters’ as an option on the request to go live page
by changing the radio buttons to a group of checkboxes, so the user can
choose as many or as few as they want.
This commit also does a bunch of housekeeping stuff around the tests for
this page, because they haven’t been touched in quite some time.
We didn’t make this self-service before because the pricing information
wasn’t published (ie we had to send it to services that asked for it).
Now that we publish pricing information in the app, there’s no reason
why services can’t make an informed decision about whether they want
international SMS or not.
So this commit:
- removes the platform admin button
- adds some radio buttons that our users can click with their mice
Platform admins can now disable sending sms for a service. If sending
sms is disabled, this will also hide all the other sms options in the
Settings table.
Platform admins can now disable sending of emails for a service. If
sending emails is disabled, this will also hide the option to change the
Email reply to address.
Users might be interested in inbound SMS. And when it’s fully
available, they’ll probably be able to control whether it’s on/off for
their service.
Until they point, the only way of getting it is to ask us. So let’s make
an in-the-meantime page that directs them to ask us, from the place
where they’d be able to do it themselves.
Users might be interested in letters. And when they’re fully
available, users will probably be able to control whether letters are
on/off for their service.
Until that point, the only way of getting the feature is to ask us. So
let’s make an in-the-meantime page that directs them to ask us, from the
place where they’d be able to do it themselves.
Wording TBC.
Users might be interested in international SMS. And when it’s fully
available, they’ll probably be able to control whether it’s on/off for
their service.
Until they point, the only way of getting it is to ask us. So let’s
make an in-the-meantime page that directs them to ask us, from the place
where they’d be able to do it themselves.
Does two main things:
- defines what ‘brands’ we support, in terms of the ID that DVLA use
- adds a form to choose which branding a service uses (currently
platform admin only, like email branding)
By doing this we will be able to (with some more work) preview and send
letters with a variety of different branding.
Story: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/143506905
no actual template functionality yet - just the ability for services
that have letters enabled to edit a 10 line block that will go on the
top right hand side of their letters with contact information
In pages specific to a service (e.g. dashboard and sub pages) the title
needs to distinguish which service it applies to. This is mainly to give
context to screen reader users who could be managing multiple services.
Implementing this uses template inheritance:
`page_title` includes `per_page_title` includes `service_page_title`
‘GOV.UK Notify’ is inserted into every page title.
Pages that set `service_page_title` get the service name inserted too.
If we want someone to read something (ie that they need to have the MOU
signed), then the best way is to make them interact with it.
And if someone doesn’t have the MOU in place, then we need to know to
send them a copy. The best way of them telling us this is in this form,
rather than sending them to the generic contact form and have them
compose a message saying ‘please send me the MOU thanks’, which we
haven’t seen anyone actually do.
