When I split up the error messages on the check CSV page into multiple
templates, I also reduced the repetition of wrapping `<div>`s and macro
calls by moving them up outside the conditional blocks (see
8e947f315d).
Unfortunately I didn’t make the same adjustments for the one-off flow,
which meant that errors on these pages lost their styling. This commit
re-adds the styling for these error messages.
This was causing a 500 because of a bug in utils. It only occurred when
there was missing data for a cell in the recipient column. I’ve also
added a test for missing data in a non-recipient column just in case.
There’s no immediate feedback with letter jobs, unlike email or text
messages jobs where you see the numbers starting to tick over straight
away.
We need to reassure the user that the thing they asked us to do (send
letters) is underway. ‘Printing’ feels like the natural first state of
the letter-making process. So this commit adds a banner to tell the
user that printing is the thing that’s happening.
If sending SMS is disabled for a service, it should not be possible to
add or modify SMS templates. If a user tries to do this, they should see
a different page with a link to go back. The same thing should happen
with email templates.
`test_utils.py` is actually a file for testing some utils, not
some utils for testing.
Test helper functions and fixtures are better placed in conftest,
and also means that we can use them in conftest.
The following errors may happen:
* Number outside of service if service in trial mode
* Message too long for sms
* Service over daily limit
We need to handle these. They only return on send, rather than in a
separate validation step (for now).
‘One-off’ is a bit wooly. Feels like our name for the thing. ‘Send to
one recipient’ matches ‘Upload recipients’.
This also means making the `<h1>` on job page ‘Report’ for one-off
messages. It doesn’t make sense to call the feature ‘send to one
recipient’ when we’re not using the language of one-off any more.
It’s a confusing proposition to have two features which are almost
identical. Even differentiating between them in the template menu would
be tricky.
I think the better thing to do is rename the whole feature to ‘send
one-off message’.
Then if someone wants to use there own phone number or email address,
give them a quick shortcut to doing that, once they’re in the flow.
In the background this reuses the ‘send yourself a test’ code, but
the user is never aware that they’re going through a different route
to send an individual message. So the proposition stays nice and clean.
We have some fairly complicated nested if statements in our Jinja that
decide what the page titles should be. It’s only going to get more
complicated with the send individual message routes.
So this commit:
- moves the logic from Jinja to Python
- adds tests to check things are working as expected
- sets the page titles to the right thing for each flow
This commit adds an extra, initial, step to the ‘send one-off message’
flow to ask for a phone number or email address. This is the first pass
at making a feature which caseworkers or similar could use Notify to
send individual messages while they’re working a case.
This commit adds a route which is identical to send yourself a test, but
with its own endpoint. This will let us add a slightly different
‘send a one-off message’ flow. This commit just adds the route though,
and makes sure that the tests pass for both routes.
Because we put the step in the URL, users could:
- skip ahead to a later step
- navigate to a step which doesn’t exist (ie an index greater than the
number of placeholders)
This commit adds some checks to do the sensible thing in the unlikely
event that either of these situations occur.
Calculating the number of pages in a letter is quite slow. And the send
yourself a test pages need to load _fast_. Since filling in placeholders
is very unlikely to change the number of pages in the resultant letter,
it’s pretty safe to cache that count, and makes the subsequent pages
load a lot faster.
The send yourself a test feature is useful for two things:
- constructing an email/text message/letter without uploading a CSV file
- seeing what the thing your going to send will look like (either by
getting it in your inbox or downloading the PDF)
- learning the concept of placeholders, ie understanding they’re thing
that gets populated with _stuff_
The problem we’re seeing is that the current UI breaks when a template
has a lot of placeholders. This is especially apparent with letter
templates, which have a minimum of 7 placeholders by virtue of the
address.
The idea behind having the form fields side-by-side was to help people
understand the relationship between their spreadsheet columns and the
placeholders. But this means that the page was doing a lot of work,
trying to teach:
- replacement of placeholders
- link between placeholders and spreadsheet columns
The latter is better explained by the example spreadsheet shown on the
upload page. So it can safely be removed from the send yourself a test
page – in other words the fields don’t need to be shown side by side.
Showing them one-at-a-time works well because:
- it’s really obvious, even on first use, what the page is asking you to
do
- as your step through each placeholder, you see the message build up
with the data you’ve entered – you’re learning how replacement of
placeholders works by repetition
This also means adding a matching endpoint for viewing each step of
making the test letter as a PDF/PNG because we can’t reuse the view of
the template without any placeholders filled any more.
It makes the error message quite noisy.
We’re going to move the table right underneath the error message, so
you’ll be able to see the column names right there.
Send yourself a test is:
- a good way of explaining how placeholders work
- a useful tool for checking your work before you send a big batch
It’s not a good way of learning about the relationship between columns
in a spreadsheet and placeholders. The ‘example spreadsheet’ thing is
good at making that connection. The table on this page isn’t, because
it doesn’t _feel_ like you’re making a spreadsheet with the send
yourself a test feature (even though that’s what you’re doing in the
background). This will be even more the case when we stop putting the
input boxes horizontally on one page.
By removing the table from this page it makes the page simpler, which
allows people to focus on the important thing – what’s happening to
their message.
If a service can send internationally, our CSV validation should not
catch valid international phone numbers. This means calling through
to code added to utils in:
- [ ] https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-utils/pull/156
This has been removed from utils (so things will break if utils is
upgraded without this change isn’t made). I think it’s friendlier to
present the phone number as the user entered it anyway – because this is
what they think a ‘correct’ phone number representation looks like
anyway.
