Users might be interested in inbound SMS. And when it’s fully
available, they’ll probably be able to control whether it’s on/off for
their service.
Until they point, the only way of getting it is to ask us. So let’s make
an in-the-meantime page that directs them to ask us, from the place
where they’d be able to do it themselves.
If clicked you will be prompted to enter a sms sender number, when setting the permission on or off.
Team members will always be able to see the number, but will only be able to change it if the inbound_sms permission is off.
Users might be interested in letters. And when they’re fully
available, users will probably be able to control whether letters are
on/off for their service.
Until that point, the only way of getting the feature is to ask us. So
let’s make an in-the-meantime page that directs them to ask us, from the
place where they’d be able to do it themselves.
Wording TBC.
Users might be interested in international SMS. And when it’s fully
available, they’ll probably be able to control whether it’s on/off for
their service.
Until they point, the only way of getting it is to ask us. So let’s
make an in-the-meantime page that directs them to ask us, from the place
where they’d be able to do it themselves.
Does two main things:
- defines what ‘brands’ we support, in terms of the ID that DVLA use
- adds a form to choose which branding a service uses (currently
platform admin only, like email branding)
By doing this we will be able to (with some more work) preview and send
letters with a variety of different branding.
Story: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/143506905
Users who go to edit the contact details for a letter from the template
page get very confused when they click save and are dumped on the
settings page. It doesn’t match the way editing other parts of
letter works, and you can’t see an accurate preview of the changes from
the settings page.
So this commit changes the flow to go from the _edit contact details_
page back to the _view template_ page when the user has got there by
clicking the blue _Edit_ button on the _view template_ page.
no actual template functionality yet - just the ability for services
that have letters enabled to edit a 10 line block that will go on the
top right hand side of their letters with contact information
If we want someone to read something (ie that they need to have the MOU
signed), then the best way is to make them interact with it.
And if someone doesn’t have the MOU in place, then we need to know to
send them a copy. The best way of them telling us this is in this form,
rather than sending them to the generic contact form and have them
compose a message saying ‘please send me the MOU thanks’, which we
haven’t seen anyone actually do.
This was an early reckon feature. There were a few of problems with
it:
- it worked on the service, not just on the API keys as described
- it was back to front, ‘suspending’ a service set `active` to `True`,
reactivating it set `active` to `False`
- no part of the API actually respected the `active` flag on a service
The same intent can be acheived by either:
- revoking an API key
- having a platform admin put your service back into trial mode
So this commit removes the link and the code behind it.
The service API client was updating every attribute of a service. Which,
while kinda clunky, is fine…
…until something calling it doesn’t pass in every attribute of the
current service. It was then defaulting optional parameters to `None`.
Which resulted in a bug whereby every time a service was set to live,
its `reply_to_address` and `sms_sender_name` got overwritten to be
empty.
This commit changes the `update` method to only require the service ID,
and pass whatever other named arguments it received straight through to
the API. The API handles partial updates just fine (I think).
