This starts using the sms_{cost, charged, free_allowance_used}
fields in the new API to replace the "get_free_paid_breakdown"
function we had before, which could not support multiple rates.
In order to use "get_free_paid_breakdown" the calling method had
to store a "cumulative" variable to calculate the free allowance
used so far, which is now done by the API.
To calculate the data for conftest.py, I had to start from the
bottom ("April") and manually calculate the free allowance used
to emulate the API - this is what "cumulative" used to do.
So we don’t have to deploy a change on a Saturday.
In the future this could pull from the rates in the database, but while
that code is shifting around I didn’t want to touoch it. We’d also have
to think about caching so as not to have a non-authenticated route
hitting the database.
Note: I've removed the pricing assertion in the "0_free_allowance"
test as it's covered elsewhere - the value of the test is really to
check that we don't show the remainder if there never was any.
The previous, manual calculation could be incorrect depending on
which SMS rates the free allowance was attributed to.
The new field also supersedes the old "letter_total" bolt-on so we
can get cost information consistently for both types.
At the moment, we put the sms rate on the usage page for each
months billing data by taking the single sms rate for the year.
The assumption that there will be a single sms rate for the year is
no longer going to be true. Therefore, instead we take the sms
rate from the monthly data itself which tells us the rate for
a months worth of sent SMS.
the safe filter is quite dangerous - it allows HTML to be rendered as
passed through (the default action is to escape all html), so should
only be used with trusted input. Move it so we only apply it to fields
we specifically expect to have HTML in - in this case, some tables
contain links to other pages.
Also, clean up the variable names for some of these info tables, as they
didn't really make sense.
This makes the rendering the same as for "created_by_name" when the
data isn't present. It's a bit more complicated for "updated_at" so
I checked that it's implicitly covered by the tests, which fail if I
remove the "if" conditional for any of these fields.
This replaces the slider with an integer input for each provider.
Unfortunately showing a variable number of inputs isn't easy to
achieve in WTForms [^1], but we think this is the least worst way
to do it vs e.g. not using WTForms at all.
[^1]: https://github.com/wtforms/wtforms/issues/736
This isn't used and showing priorities when we only have a single
provider or where they have no effect is unnecessarily confusing.
Removing the form makes it clearer that there's only one way to
adjust priorities for domestic SMS providers.
If we add another email or international SMS provider in future,
we would need to rewrite the form here anyway as the priorities
need to be adjusted in tandem, not individually.
Using "primary" made sense when the other "secondary" provider was
new, but today we see them as equivalent and the terminology is a
bit confusing. In future we may add a third provider as well.
Users who have no mobile number set, users who are not on email auth
and users who are not on "Change mobile number" page should not
see the delete link.
This made it easier to debug a problem with the functional tests
due to the fixtures not working correctly [^1]. It's a platform
admin only convenience over knowing the page URL.
We may want to expose the top-level "/api-integration" page but
that will require more work to show which broadcasts were sent with
which key - currently it's oriented around "messages". For now I
think it's useful to see what keys a service has.
[^1]: https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-functional-tests/pull/411#pullrequestreview-920069799
On the ‘find user’ page it says ‘sms_auth’ instead of ‘Text message
code’.
This commit fixes that, and adds a handy formatter so it’s easier to do
the right thing in the future.
Having a grid in the click target stops the hint
and status text being clickable. This removes it
in favour using flexbox to position the elements
in a similar way.
Includes fallback styles for browsers that don't
support flexbox that positions the child elements
inline, laid out justified, to mimic the flexbox
positioning of justify-content: space-between.
Note: display is overriden on child items under
flexbox so setting display: inline-block is
ignored.
