We store our audit history in two ways:
1. A list of versions of a service
2. A list of events to do with API keys
In the future there could be auditing data which we want to display that
is stored in other formats (for example the event table).
This commit adds some objects which wrap around the different types of
auditing data, and expose a consistent interface to them. This
architecture will let us:
- write clean code in the presentation layer to display these events on
a page
- add more types of events in the future by subclassing the `Event` data
type, without having to rewrite anything in the presentation layer
We weren't checking if a service was in trial mode when they try to send
an uploaded file. If a service is in trial mode, we now show a banner at
the top of the preview page and no send button.
The overlay was showing for any invalid pdf - we only want to show the
overlay for invalid pdf files where there is content outside the
printable area.
We now use the pattern of showing a box at the top of the page with the
error. The error message has a heading and can have additional details.
Error messages and the invalid pages get stored in the S3 metadata.
We hardcode this as second class for the moment but eventually
will let the user pick.
Currently the API appears to do no validation, e.g. a json
schema, that rejects API calls with the extra key for postage.
Next steps will be to put a PR into the API that will expect a
postage value in the request and save it with the rest of the
notification. Then when that is done we can add the user interface
to the admin app to let the user pick the postage.
The ids are not needed for the first iteration of the Get started page, but we'll start using them as we add and iterate guidance and features content.
We should mention letter branding as a feature.
Otherwise you have a visible copy of the text underlapping the text in the textbox. Which, when they don’t quite align makes the text look bold. Seems to be more noticeable on some browsers/operating systems than others, but a bug all the same.
If there aren’t a range of options (normally presented as radio buttons)
to show the user on the email branding request page then we just show
the textbox. But we were still doing form validation on the radio
buttons, even though the user couldn’t see them to click them. This
stopped the user from being able to submit the form.
This commit fixes the problem by, in this specific case, pre-ticking the
‘Something else’ radio button.
