The team page was a bit of a mess:
- invited and active tables didn’t line up
- lots of things were wrapping onto two lines
- the empty fields for when a user didn’t have permissions looked broken
This commit splits each row of the table (not actually a table any more)
onto two lines. First line has the user’s info, second has their
permissions and any associated actions.
This banner was always being shown because the template was never
getting sent the service’s templates from the API.
This commit fixes this to only show the banner when a service has no
templates, and adds some tests to make sure it doesn’t happen again.
We’ve seen people land on this page and expect the message to be on
their phone already.
‘Check and confirm’ sounds a lot like ‘check your phone’, which is
language that we use earlier on when we _have_ sent a message.
Hopefully ‘preview’ is a better indication that it’s not sent yet.
After the tour we should ground users by dropping them on the dashboard.
In the background, we delete the example text message template. This
means that users start from a clean slate when they go to add their own
templates
This also means some wording changes to the tour so it still makes
(some) sense:
- 1, 2 and 3 should refer to the current step, not describe the next
one
- the link should take you to the dashboard
- change from ‘Get started’ to ‘Try this example’ because we’re using
‘Get started on the dashboard’
Since you can’t really send or edit a deleted template we should show
a message telling you that the template has been deleted.
This is important because deleted templates still show up in the
template statistics.
We reckon that:
- a ‘blank slate’ templates page is a better start
- the example template hurt more than it helped when it comes to
understanding placeholders
Steps to reproduce:
- make a template with a placeholder
- click ‘send yourself a test’
- leave fields blank
- click ‘check’
- see error, click ‘back’
Expected: previous page
Actual: previous page with blue help sidebar
When the URL contains `help=0`, `request.args.get('help')` returns '0'.
Doing `if '0':` is the same as doing any `if <non empty string>:` which
returns `True`.
So we should only display the help when the help query parameter is:
- not missing
- AND a string that isn’t `'0'`
While test messages technically have a file and are a job, there’s not
much reason to ever revisit them. So all they end up doing is cluttering
the dashboard and making it harder to find the actual files you’ve
actually uploaded from your computer.
So this commit:
- abstracts the name of test messages into config
- filters out any files whose filename represents a test message
- adds some more thorough tests for the jobs on the dashboard
It was a `<dl>` before which is kinda weird. Especially when the jobs
table was a real `<table>`.
It also means we can give it column headings so that new and invited
users have a better idea of what it is.
parts of the initial setup/login stages were throwing 500s if user
not already in process (ie: user directly navigated to url):
* /resend-email-verification
* /text-not-received
* /send-new-code
* verify
We can filter all notifications by status already. This commit reuses
the same code to filter the notifications for a job by status.
This means that, visually we can show the count on a job the same as
we do for all notifications, which is similar to how we show the counts
on the dashboard, so hopefully it feels like a bit more of a solid
thing.
This also applies to CSV downloads and AJAX updates, which will inherit
any filtering that their parent page has applied.
The graphs of template usage feel a bit weird to me now.
1. They are counts of messages, but the numbers are very small
not big like we do everywhere else (eg the counts on a job)
2. There’s a lot of blue, especially for something that you can’t
click
This commit makes the numbers bigger and the bar chart grey.
registration will allow user to check and modify mobile number.
Registered (active) users will only be able to request resend to their
existing registered number.
If you get linked to a single version of a template, you’re at a dead
end. Let’s add a link to go back up a level to where you can understand
the current version in context.
We have tables listing notifications on:
- the job page
- the ‘activity’ page
Previously that had subtly different information, in a different order.
This commit makes them exactly the same.
- _Processed_ is all the notifications that we know about, ie sending,
failed and delivered
- _Sending_ is notifications that we have either put into a queue or are
waiting to hear back from the provider about.
The big numbers on the dashboard are a count of all the messages we’ve
processed. So when you click them, the table of notifications you see
on the dashboard should contain that number of notifications.
This also gets the activity page one step closer to being like the job
page:
| Before | After
---------|----------------------------|---------------------------------
Activity | Sending, failed, both | Processed, sending, failed, delivered
Job page | Sending, failed, delivered | Sending, failed, delivered
The link to download a CSV of notifications looks like
`/endpoint?download=csv`. This not not very web idiomatic.
The service manual recommends:
> Only use query strings for URLs with unordered parameters like options
> to search pages.
The CSV is a different representation of the same data, it does not
perform searching or filtering on the data.
The proper way (as we do elsewhere in this app) is to put an extension
on the endpoint to indicate an alternate representation, eg
`/endpoint.csv`
Downloading a CSV of notifications is very similar to viewing them on
a webpage. So I think it’s sensible to move the assertions about the
CSV download link into the same test, rather than it being it’s own
test.
This means being able to reuse the parametrization introuced in this
commit’s parent.
