Only users who work for government can accept the terms of use. This
will save us from having to email these requesters back telling them
they need to find someone else to submit the request.
We suggest people format their numbers with commas when telling us how
many things they’re going to send.
This causes problems when we paste these values into a spreadsheet,
because the commas get interpreted as column separators.
Otherwise we can end up collecting invalid email addresses…
This required some refactoring to allow our email fields to be optional
(but not by default).
The value that means no branding (in the form) has changed from `'None'`
to `'__NONE__'`.
This commit:
- accounts for that value
- makes sure that no branding (ie plain GOV.UK) is still displayed when
no query argument is given
Added a link to cancel letters from the letter notification pages if the
letter is still able to be cancelled. Clicking on this link will show a
confirmation box, and will then cancel the letter if the user confirms.
so that they better align with the front-end, where they'll be used in
data attributes. Also, making the kebab case is nice because it doesn't
give favouritism to either JS or python naming conventions
Data retention lookup by type is only performed to get the number
of days, so we can update the service method to return the number
or the default directly.
Adds caching for service data retention. This removes separate API
client methods to retrieve individual data retention records by id
or type in favor of a single method that fetches and caches all
retention settings configured for the service. This makes it much
easier to invalidate cache when settings change.
Lookup by id or type is provided by helper methods in the service
model.
WTForms coerces `None` as a choice to `'None'` as a string when
rendering form fields (form fields will only ever have string data
because that what the browser posts back).
But internally WTForms coerces `None` to mean an unset value, ie where
the user hasn’t selected a radio button:
283b280320/src/wtforms/utils.py (L1-L20)
We shouldn’t use `None` to mean two different things. And in fact we
can’t, because it in effect means that we’re always getting a value
for the `move_to` field, even if the user hasn’t chosen to move any
templates. Which results in some very expected behaviour.
This saves one call to the API or Redis in the common case where the
current service does have templates.
This is because `any()` evaluates all expressions before running,
whereas `or` will only evaluate the second expression if the first
returns `False`-y.
Since we’re letting users add new folders directly from the choose page
it makes sense that they should also be able to add templates from
there.
This resolves the problem we saw in user research where people found it
hard to know where to go to add a new folder when they were all behind
one green button.
None of our model or view layer code should need to know about accepted
invites. We don’t use them anywhere because once an invite is accepted
that person is now a user.
Putting this logic in the client means that:
- none of the code calling the client needs to care about accepted
invites
- it’s easier to (if we want) update the API code to not return accepted
invites
This was always showing the text 'Your letter has been sent...' This has
now been updated to start 'Your letters have been sent...' if a job has
more than one notification in it.
This commit adds content pages for the notifications pages, particularly
the letter pages, which will make things clearer now that we will soon be allowing
letters to be cancelled.
The main changes are:
* The confirmation banner for letters sent from a CSV file now states when
printing will start.
* We state the CSV file that notifications were sent from on the
notifications page
* The notification page for letters shows when printing starts (today,
tomorrow, or that date that the letter was printed)
this lets us combine the two actions to create "Move to a new folder".
If the user hits enter rather than clicking a button, there is a hidden
submit button that (for now) prevents them from taking any action.
A future commit will try and understand what the user might be doing
based on which fields are populated/selected.
Since you can now see them when searching you should also be able to
select and move them. Which means that they needed to be included in
the `Form`’s list of possible choices of things to move.
The Jinja template for the ‘choose templates’ page is now pulling in
data from a lot of diparate places in order to work out what to show. As
we add more logic about what to show (in order to make the live search
work) it’s going to get harder to have all this logic in the Jinja
template.
This commit refactors it back into Python where we have more language
features for managing complex logic.
It’s a bit weird to call this file a model, in that it’s dealing with
some presentational logic, rather than just data. Conceptually it’s more
like a view model[1].
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel
We’ve moved away from using the expand/collapse pattern on the page
where you click ‘send’. Instead we’re putting the send button in the
sticky footer.
So it’s a bit jarring to still have the expand/collapse on the page you
see after you’ve sent an email. This commit replaces it with the sticky
footer as well.
This is only relevant for emails because:
1. Text messages are generally short enough to fit on the screen
2. We don’t show the status of letters because they don’t really change
