- Deleted /stylesheets folder
- Removed sass build from gulpfile
- Changed gov links to usa links
- Changed other govuk styles, like breadcrumbs
- Changed name of uk_components file to us_components
- Fixed a few tests that broke on account of the changes
* Updated header and footer
* Moved files around and updated gulpfile to correct the build process when it goes to production
* Updated fonts
* Adjusted grid templating
* Adding images to assets
* Updated account pages, dashboard, and pages in message sending flow
* Updated the styling for the landing pages in the account section once logged in
* Updated header and footer
* Updated fonts
* Moved files around and updated gulpfile to correct the build process when it goes to production
* Adjusted grid templating
* Added images to assets
* Update app/templates/components/uk_components/footer/template.njk
Co-authored-by: Steven Reilly <stvnrlly@users.noreply.github.com>
The page_header macro includes an optional back link. Since the
page_header is always used inside `<main>`, where the back link should
not be, this stops setting the back link in the page header and instead
sets it in the new `backLink` block.
Previously this lead to 2 support tickets because the user didn't
understand why their messages was being split into 2 fragments. We
tried modifying the message about charges, but that made it more
complicated. Adding a hint should hopefully be enough.
This adds spacing classes from the design system where necessary to keep
the spacing looking the same.
It also replaces the `<aside>` elements with a `<div>` on the edit
template pages. The accessibility audit noted that these were inside a
`<main>` element, so screen readers may not be able to navigate the
elements correctly.
The content length message was making the page jumpy and causing reflows
in three ways. This commit addresses each of those ways:
As the user scrolled
---
The footer went from fixed to sticky and the spacing around the message
changed. This change in spacing was needed so that the message looked
right in both contexts.
I think the best way to resolve this is to not use the sticky footer
when editing text message or broadcast templates.
On my 1440×900 screen I can fit a 5 fragment text message, plus the
‘will be charged as 5 text messages’ message, plus the save button.
Our top 10 screen resolutions according to our analytics are:
Position | Resolution | Percentage of users
---------|------------|--------------------
1 | 1920x1080 | 27.37%
2 | 1280×720 | 11.07%
3 | 1366×768 | 8.88%
4 | 1536×864 | 5.79%
5 | 1440×900 | 4.52%
6 | 1600×900 | 3.71%
7 | 1280×1024 | 3.10%
8 | 1680×1050 | 2.42%
9 | 1920×1200 | 2.33%
10 | 2560×1440 | 1.99%
When the page first loaded
---
The message is empty so takes up no space, then the javascript fires
and inserts the message, taking up a line of space.
This is resolved by making the empty message take up space with a
non-breaking space character.
When the user first typed
---
We previously didn’t show any message until the user started typing.
This meant that, with the above fix, there was a larger than normal
empty space between the textarea and the save button.
This is resolved by always showing the message, even when the user
hasn’t typed anything yet.
***
These are design decisions which made sense when the message was
displayed along side the button, but we’ve had to change now that the
message is above the button.
We feel that this is more appropriate because it’s part of the
information you’re agreeing to before you hit submit.
Sometimes users can missing information that doesn’t start left-aligned
to the column they’re interacting with.
It also makes it closer to the Design System component.
We’re keeping it in the sticky footer, so that it’s always visible no
matter where in the message you’re scrolled to (this means you won’t
have to edited to content then scroll down to check whether you’ve
made it fit).
This looks tidy, and because of the sticky footer it means the message
is always visible, even if your template is quite long. So no matter
where you’re scrolled to in the template you don’t have to scroll to the
bottom to see the count update.
This commit copies the same ARIA attributes that are added to the
character count component[1] in the GOV.UK Design System.
This means that screen reader users will hear the count message when
they stop typing.
1. https://design-system.service.gov.uk/components/character-count/
This commit adds some Javascript that makes AJAX requests as the users
changes the content of their template.
It then takes the content returned by the backend and inserts it in the
page.
Proof of concept for the GovukRadiosField class.
Includes the removal of the a DataRequired
validator. This doesn't seem to be needed as the
RadioField superclass catches any submissions
without any data from field.choices in its
pre_validate method (which also outputs the
correct error message).
Updates StringField to GovukTextInputField.
These changes also affect the following forms that
inherit from BaseTemplateForm:
- SMSTemplateForm
- EmailTemplateForm
Includes changes to templates that use these forms
and associated tests.
We had 7 classes in _grids.scss named `.column-...` which were being
used to give a certain column width. These worked by using `@include
grid column()`, which is now deprecated.
`.column-whole` and `.column-three-quarters` can be removed and replaced
with `govuk-grid-column-full` and `govuk-grid-column-three-quarters`
respectively. The other column classes don't have a direct replacment in
GOV.UK Frontend. To get round this, we overwrite the `$govuk-grid-width`
SASS map in `extensions.scss` to add in extra widths, then use this with
the `govuk-grid-column` mixin to create new classes in for our custom
widths in `_grids.scss`
HighlightTags was bad because:
- we haven’t called placeholders ‘tags’ for a long time
- it also does resizing of the `<textarea>`, not just highlighting the
placeholders
The Design System has standardised on back links being at the top of the
page, decorated with a small text-coloured arrow.
I think this makes more sense than having them at the bottom, because it
suggests, in some way, being able to go back before commiting to any of
the forms on the page. Whereas the things at the bottom of the page
should be performing actions on what’s in the page.
The reason for making this change now is that it de-clutters the area
around the green buttons. This was presenting a design challenge where
multiple levels of interaction were happening in the same form. Moving
these back links to the top of the page should mean that, in these
complicated forms, there’s one fewer thing to compete for the user’s
attention.
I’ve componentised this into a `page_header` macro so that the change is
easier to roll out and maintain.
If you have a long template it’s annoying to have to scroll all the
way to the bottom to click save, when you’ve only changed a small thing
near the staert of the content.
This will stop us repeatedly forgetting to add `novalidate` and
`autocomplete='off'` to our forms (which is how most of them are set
up).
It uses sensible defaults, based on how we most-commonly configure
forms:
- most of our forms are `post`ed (but this can be overridden)
- `autocomplete` should only be enabled where it makes sense, otherwise
it’s more annoying than useful (but this can be overriden)
- we should never be using HTML5 form validation because our own error
styles and messages are better
Sometimes when setting up a service you might have a few very similar
templates, in which only a small amount of content. Or you might even
have a few of services, which are used by different teams but have
similar templates.
Copy and pasting, especially from one service to another, is a pain.
This commit makes it easier by allowing users to copy an existing
template when choosing to add a new one, instead of starting from
scratch.
platform_admin is a separate concept to permissions, so by removing the
checks for it from the current_user.has_permissions function, we can
simplify things greatly. We already record on the user whether they're
a platform admin anyway.
Users were having trouble finding the delete template link. It sort of
made sense having it on the edit page before we had the view template
page. But it doesn’t make sense now – having to choose to ‘edit’ the
template before you can delete is counterintuitive.
The single template page is where you go to choose an action to perform
on your template. Deleting is a good example of an action you can
perform on a template.
So this commit moves the delete link from the edit template page to the
view template page.
It also puts the confirm banner on same page as the delete link
The idea being that, in order to make a decision about whether to delete
the template, it’s useful to be able to see the template you’re
deleting. There’s no user need to edit the template before you delete
it.
In pages specific to a service (e.g. dashboard and sub pages) the title
needs to distinguish which service it applies to. This is mainly to give
context to screen reader users who could be managing multiple services.
Implementing this uses template inheritance:
`page_title` includes `per_page_title` includes `service_page_title`
‘GOV.UK Notify’ is inserted into every page title.
Pages that set `service_page_title` get the service name inserted too.
There is a check that the template can not be created as priority if the user is not a platform admin.
There is a check that the template can not change the `priority` unless they are a platform admin.
