We mostly rely on the API returning a 404 to generate 404s for trying
to get things with non-UUID IDs. This is fine, except our tests often
mock these API calls. So it could look like everything is working fine,
except the thing your passing in might never be a valid UUID, and thus
would 404 in a non-test environment.
So this commit:
1. uses the `uuid` URL converter everywhere there’s something that looks
like an ID in a URL parameter
2. adds a test which automates checking for 1.
Events should be sorted reverse-chronologically, no matter what order
they come back from the API in, or which field in the API response
they’ve been extracted from.
This commit introduces a slightly hacky way of putting usernames against
events, given that the API only returns user IDs.
It does so without:
- making changes to the API
- making a pages that could potentially fire off dozens of API calls (ie
one per user)
This comes with the limitation that it can only get names for those team
members who are still in the team. Otherwise it will say ‘Unknown’.
In the future the API should probably return the name and email address
for the user who initiated the event, and whether that user was acting
in a platform admin capacity.
If you never create any API keys we shouldn’t give you the option to see
API-related events – it will only confuse things.
And since there’s (currently) only one type of event left once you take
API key events out of the picture it doesn’t make sense to show the
filters at all.
At the moment we have two types of event, ‘service’ events and ‘API key’
events. They are munged together which is useful initially, but could
get noisy.
This commit adds filters (copied from the choose template page) that let
users narrow down the list to one of the two types of event. This might
help users get a clearer picture of what’s going on.
Directly referencing the `ModelList` instances will let us more easily
make choices at the view layer about which kinds of events to show, and
is one less layer of indirection to jump through.
Scanning the page is difficult at the moment because it’s hard to tell
how far apart in time events are, and thereby determine which events
might be related.
Grouping the events by day quickly lets users narrow their focus to
a meaningful subset of the events.
We store our audit history in two ways:
1. A list of versions of a service
2. A list of events to do with API keys
In the future there could be auditing data which we want to display that
is stored in other formats (for example the event table).
This commit adds some objects which wrap around the different types of
auditing data, and expose a consistent interface to them. This
architecture will let us:
- write clean code in the presentation layer to display these events on
a page
- add more types of events in the future by subclassing the `Event` data
type, without having to rewrite anything in the presentation layer
