The service API client was updating every attribute of a service. Which,
while kinda clunky, is fine…
…until something calling it doesn’t pass in every attribute of the
current service. It was then defaulting optional parameters to `None`.
Which resulted in a bug whereby every time a service was set to live,
its `reply_to_address` and `sms_sender_name` got overwritten to be
empty.
This commit changes the `update` method to only require the service ID,
and pass whatever other named arguments it received straight through to
the API. The API handles partial updates just fine (I think).
This commit:
- moves things around a bit on the request to go live page
- sticks a textbox in there
So when someone click the big green button, we will get a support ticket
that looks something like:
```
From Test User <test@user.gov.uk> on behalf of Test Service
(6ce466d0-fd6a-11e5-82f5-e0accb9d11a6)
---
We’ll send about 1000 text messages in the first month, and then 10,000
text messages per month after that. Usage of our service is about 50%
higher in March, at the end of the tax year.
```
Use the new version of the notifications-python-client. This version no longer adds the req and pay to the claims of the jwt.
The change is backward compatible so an older client that sends a JWT with the extra claims will pass authentication.
Once all the clients have been updated to not include the extra claims some updates to exclude them from the method signatures will happen as well.
The documentation has been updated to reflect this change.
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/116971293
of the name against a list of all service email_from fields.
Update find_all_service_names to find_all_service_email_from, which returns the email_from of all services.
Each service on the list is linked to the dashboard page of the service.
The platform admin user can see/edit templates, see/invite users, see/edit service settings.
The platform admin user can not send messages, see/edit api keys and developer docs.
Actually this should be no op until whatever workflow will take place
in the real world is implemented.
For the moment just display flash message to say request being
processed and do nothing.
This macro:
- accepts a WTForm form field as a parameter
- renders a form field which follows the GOV.UK Elements patterns, both visually
and in markup terms
It then changes any page which uses either:
- the old, non-WTForms macro or
- the old, WTFforms `render_field` macro
…to use this new macro and removes both of the old ones.
It also adds the option to display hint text above the textbox.
For pages where
- we want you to be sure that you want to do what you’re about to do
- we want to be sure it’s you trying to do the thing
This adds a page that asks the user to confirm their password.
Adds the pages and wires them together, so that it’s possible to click
through them.
The wording is not quite English, but attempts to be an rough description of
what the consequences are for each of the four actions.
