Having this stuff split across various points in `conftest.py` was
making my brain melt.
This way I feel like it’s easier to see the input/output of the test.
A folder is relevant if it, or any of its descents contain a template of
the kind you’re looking for.
If you’re not filtering by template type then you should see all
folders.
This commit extends the tests to not only look at the name of the
displayed templates and folders, but also the hint text underneath.
Because there are going to be more variations of this hint text in the
future we need to make sure it’s tested.
Doing this in its own commit so only the meaningful changes show up in
the commits that actually change stuff.
- Add a GET / POST view: manage template folder
- Add a template for that view, where a user can rename their
folder
- Add an API client method for updating a folder
- Test the new feature, including the test that service without
permissions cannot manage a folder
Currently, a user can select a reply-to email address or text message
sender when uploading a CSV file but this is ignored and the default is
always used instead. As a first step towards changing this, this adds
the sender_id (if selected) to the S3 metadata so that this information
can be used when processing the job.
If the browser posts the value of `<input value='None'>` to the server
it does so as a string.
We want to post a value of `None` (actually JSON `null`) to the API. To
do this we:
- set the value in the form class to `'None'` (ie a string)
- convert to `None` (as a type) afterwards
However seeing `x = 'None'` in code looks a bit like a mistake. So to
make sure it looks deliberate and clear what is happening this commit:
- makes a reusable constant for `'None'`
- adds a comment explaining why it’s a string
This commit adds logic to:
- take the list of selected folders and templates
- split it into two lists (of folders and templates)
- `POST` that data to the API, to effect the movement of said folders
and templates
I’ve tried to architect it in such a way that we can easily add more
template ‘operations’ in the future, as we add more forms to the choose
template page.
This commit adds:
- checkboxes to let you select a template or folder
- radio buttons to let you select where to move those template(s) and/or
folder(s) to
It only does the `get` part of this work; handling the `post` and
calling API will be done in a subsequent commit.
It would be quite easy to dissociate the search box from the things its
supposed to be searching.
This commit adds assertions to make sure that the things the search box
is targeting are on the page
When adding a new folder it is created inside the currently active
one. The user is returned to the previously active folder page,
which shows the added folder.
This adds a new route to the add template/folder views. Thankfully,
`url_for` recognizes when `template_folder_id` is `None` and will use
the URL without `/folders/...`, so users without folder permissions
should be unaffected by this change.
When a folder is selected the full path is displayed in page title
and header (for example `Templates / Folder1 / Folder2`). Elements
of the path link to the corresponding folder. Current folder is not
linked.
Clicking on template folder navigates to a page that displays that
folder's contents.
This reuses the existing choose template view by adding a filter
based on optional `template_folder_id` argument.
Service model methods are rewritten to match `all_templates` and
`get_template`. New `get_template_folder_path` method returns a
list of folders (from root to the current one) that the selected
folder is nested inside.
With the addition of template folders we need to filter templates
based on a combination of type and parent folder ID.
This replaces the existing `templates_by_type` method with
`get_templates`, which supports both type and parent folder filters,
avoiding a need to create specific methods for each use case.
We still need the templates property to exist in some way in order
to cache it, but it needs to be clear that it's different from
`.get_templates`. One option was to make it "private" (i.e. `_templates`),
and always use `.get_templates` in the rest of the code, but this requires
adding "include all folders" to `.get_templates`, which doesn't have an
obvious interface since `parent_folder_id=None` already means "top-level
only".
This will probably come up again when we need to look into adding
templates from nested folders into the page for live search, but
for now renaming `Service.templates` to `.all_templates` makes it
clear what the property contains.
The add new templates page now has option to add template folders.
Tweaked wording of other options and h1 to clarify options since it's
not all about templates any more.
Added api client and stuff for it
When you land on the page it’s good to be able to quickly see what the
currently-set value is, before you change it.
This is unnecessarily hard if the selected item is buried half way down
the page. This commit moves it to the top.
Currently the brandings have non-deterministic sorting, which means
the order changes from page load to page load. This makes it hard to
find the item you’re looking for.
This commit sorts them by the name of the branding, same as for email
brandings.
These helper functions for modifying a service permission were just
floating around loose in the view code.
A much better home for them is on the model. This will also make it
easy to reuse them in other views if we ever need to.
In trial mode you can’t send letters. But it’s still useful to be able
to build up a letter to see how it work.
Best place to put this error is before someone tries to send a letter
for real.
We didn’t used to allow this because it wasn’t really possible with the
old DVLA set up and we didn’t think there’s a need.
We think it’s possible now because, even though it’s cumbersome, it’s
better than the manual process.
There’s a lot of code in service settings which:
- talks to the API directly through the clients
- passes that information through to the Jinja template
By encapsulating this logic in the service model:
- the Jinja template can access the data directly
- the logic can be reused across multiple methods
This commit is the first step to disentangling the models from the API
clients. With the models in the same folder as the API clients it makes
it hard to import the API clients within the model without getting a
circular import.
After this commit the user API clients still has this problem, but at
least the service API client doesn’t.
Making people use a property is a sure way to make sure they’re spelling
the name of the property correctly, and allows us to easily swap out
properties that call through to the underlying JSON, and properties
which are implemented as methods.
This means we can have a method on the service model which hits the API
(or Redis) but can be called multiple times (within the context of a
request) without making multiple network requests.
It does this by storing the results of the method on the object’s
internal `__dict__` the first time the method is called.
We do a lot of logic around choosing which templates to show. This logic
is all inside one view method.
It makes it cleaner to break this logic up into functions. But this
would mean passing around variables from one function to another.
Putting these methods onto a class (the service model) means that
there’s a place to store this data (rather than having to pass it around
a lot).
Making this code more manageable is important so that when we have
templates and folders it’s easy to encapsulate the logic around
combining the two.
`_get_current_service` is a function which gets called every time
`current_service` is referenced in a view method or Jinja template.
Because the service model was getting initialised inside this function
it was being reconstructed many times in one request. On the service
settings page, for example, it was getting initialised 43 times, adding
about 200ms to the response time.
This commit moves its initialisation to the point where we’re getting
the data from the API, which only happens once per request.
We already have tests for the
/services/<service_id>/notifications/<notification_type> page, but these
were not testing the page when there were failed notifications, so this
adds a test for the page in this situation.
