Until all the data is updated to always be "all", we have to handle the
case of provider_restriction being set to None or "all" (which mean the
same thing).
The code can be tidied up once the broadcast provider_restriction is never None.
Note, no option at the moment to set the service broadcast account type
as None, or back to without the broadcast permission. This has been done
for speed of development given the chance of us needing this is very
low. We can add it later if we need to.
Update all methods that were previous calling @cache.delete('service-{service-id}-template-None') to instead call _delete_template_cache_for_service
Remove call to get service templates, it's not needed since all template version cache is being deleted.
This bit of code is just a safety check to make sure we don’t
inadvertently updating something we shouldn’t (see
0cfe10639a for context).
`rate_limit` is something we allow the admin app to update now (as of
939029a9be).
We were trying to delete the old 'template-{template-id}' keys but
should have been deleting the new keys which have the service id as part
of the key name. This was causing the cache to not be correctly purged
when we did things like update sender names or set defaults. This should
fix it.
As if this is chosen as default, then the template data will be stale as
they do not have the latest reply to address.
We are already doing this for create/update/delete for sms senders and
contact lists for letters, it was just the create we were missing for
email reply to addresses.
We can drop use of the old key as we no longer need to read data from
the old key. Either data exists in the new key and we read it from there
or data doesn't exist in the new key and we go to the API to get it and
then set it in redis.
Note, the previous commit is important because it means we aren't at
risk of when this commit is being deployed out, of us getting stale data
from the old key.
We want to change cache keys for templates and broadcasts to include
their service ID. So cache keys should change from
`template-{template_id}-versions` to
`service-{service_id}-template-{template_id}-versions`.
The first step of this which needs to be deployed as a change first is
to delete both keys when updating service templates (even if they key is
not yet set). This means that when we release code in the next PR to
start setting the new key, we won't run into a case where either the old
or the new key can remain set with stale data.
sms sender, email reply to, letter contact blocks.
These are all cached within template, under `template.reply_to` - if the
template doesnt have a specific default, then that field stores the
service default. So when service default changes, we need to clear the
template cache so that it is updated to reflect that.
We already use this pattern for deleting the template cache for a bunch
of templates in `template_folder_api_client.move_to_folder`
The API now[1] accepts requests on `…/guest-list` as well as
`…/whitelist`. This commit starts using the former, which means:
- the use of ‘whitelist’ is fully gone from the admin app
- the API can stop using it, at least in URLs
1. As of https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-api/pull/2928
This should speed things up by:
- less time waiting for big blobs of JSON to come from Redis or the API
- less time spent deserialising big blobs of JSON
Fixes a bug where we were calling a wrapper method when instead we
should have been calling the redis_client. This had resulted in no
actual calls to redis happening.
When the admin app gets user objects from the API, these include a dict
of permissions by service for what the user can do to that services.
Permissions for inactive services are not included in the response as
per:
87cb6f2597/app/dao/permissions_dao.py (L66)
However, this causes a bug where a service is archived but cached user
data still tells us that the user has permissions to view the service.
This should not be the case and causes errors where users can still see
the archived service page, it's settings, and even request to go live
for it, because they are using old cached data for the user.
We solve this by deleting the users who are part of the service from the
cache.
We also delete the templates for this service from the cache as the
templates are also archived when we ask the API to archive the service
as per:
d95c0131e0/app/service/rest.py (L597)
Note, one decision I had to make was whether to delete the user cache
for just active team members or also invited users. Assuming an invited
user can't see the service until they've accepted their invite anyway, it
shouldn't make any difference whether we delete their cache or not.
We’re going to start using the returned letters summary to show some
info on the dashboard.
This means we will be accessing it more often than it changes. And we
know exactly when it changes because it’s us manually submitting the
references we get from DVLA.
This makes it a good candidate for being cached, and Redis is where we
cache stuff that we’d otherwise go to the API for.
This page displays a list of available reports, a report is a set of returned lettters that have been reported on the same day.
Each line of the page is a link that can download the report.
I'm not sure the format of the csv is right. The data might be confusing especially if the service has a mix of precompiled templates and jobs.
Units tests are still to come.
We store our audit history in two ways:
1. A list of versions of a service
2. A list of events to do with API keys
In the future there could be auditing data which we want to display that
is stored in other formats (for example the event table).
This commit adds some objects which wrap around the different types of
auditing data, and expose a consistent interface to them. This
architecture will let us:
- write clean code in the presentation layer to display these events on
a page
- add more types of events in the future by subclassing the `Event` data
type, without having to rewrite anything in the presentation layer
If we change our mind and decide whether a service should/should not be
counted in the list of live services then we should also drop the cache
which stores the count of how many live services there are.
Returns the data calculated by the API. Stored in Redis against a
hardcoded key so that no-one hammering the home page is directly hitting
the database.
Adds a front end for:
https://github.com/alphagov/notifications-api/pull/2417
> Sometimes we have to make a few services for what really is one
> service, for example GOV.UK Pay and GOV.UK Pay Direct Debit. We also
> have our own test services which aren’t included in the count of live
> services. We currently count these as one service by not including
> them in the beta partners spreadsheet.
We get a bunch of requests to go live where people have told us they're
going to send email but there is no email reply-to address present.
These come from 2 scenarios:
1. when there are email templates, and no reply to address – but they
ignore the checklist
2. when there are no email templates (yet) but they provide anticipated
volumes for email
At the moment we only auto-check for a reply to address when they have
email templates. And because the question about anticipated volumes
follows the checklist, you'll get a checklist that passes (reply
addresses not required as no templates present) - but your future intent
that differs (reply address IS required because you have anticipated
volumes).
So let’s bring the request for anticipated volumes into the checklist,
that way we can dynamically add the requirement for a reply to address
if they say they will send email but don't have templates yet.
We should begin storing it in the database against the service to stop
people having to re-enter it each time they try to complete the go live
screens.
This also means moving the ‘consent to research question’ along with
the questions about volume, because
- we want people to answer both before going live
- we don’t want to clutter up the summary page by asking questions there
too
new code is copied stylistically from the email branding patterns.
Instead of `service.dvla_organisation`, there's now
`service.letter_branding` and `service.letter_branding_id`. However,
unlike email branding we're not currently showing a preview of the
logo. That can come later when we work out how we want to do it.
This removes some code which is duplicative and obscure (ie it’s not
very clear why we do `"a" * 73` even though there is a Very Good Reason
for doing so).
